IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-mo-flags-01.txt

Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no> Mon, 16 May 2005 17:21 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DXjHU-0001Gv-Dw; Mon, 16 May 2005 13:21:28 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DXjHR-0001GL-De; Mon, 16 May 2005 13:21:25 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA13336; Mon, 16 May 2005 13:21:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tyholt.uninett.no ([158.38.60.10]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DXjXw-0004VT-DW; Mon, 16 May 2005 13:38:31 -0400
Received: from storhaugen.uninett.no (storhaugen.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:7:211:d8ff:fe8f:1f9b]) by tyholt.uninett.no (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j4GHLALL013727; Mon, 16 May 2005 19:21:10 +0200
Received: from storhaugen.uninett.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by storhaugen.uninett.no (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j4GHLKLe022681; Mon, 16 May 2005 19:21:20 +0200
Received: (from venaas@localhost) by storhaugen.uninett.no (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j4GHLKx7022680; Mon, 16 May 2005 19:21:20 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: storhaugen.uninett.no: venaas set sender to Stig.Venaas@uninett.no using -f
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 19:21:20 +0200
From: Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-mo-flags-01.txt
Message-ID: <20050516172120.GA22530@storhaugen.uninett.no>
References: <8E296595B6471A4689555D5D725EBB212B347C@xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8E296595B6471A4689555D5D725EBB212B347C@xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08e48e05374109708c00c6208b534009
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, "Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com>, IPv6 WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

Another reason they need to be only hints to the clients, is that there
might be many different types of clients on the same link. I think there
are many cases where you don't want to force all the clients to do the
same. One thing is what information a client wants to obtain, another is
what it supports. Does the client do DHCP at all, does it just do state-
less, or does it do the full 3315.

Stig

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email