RE: [dhcwg] Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-mo-flags-01.txt

"Bernie Volz \(volz\)" <volz@cisco.com> Mon, 16 May 2005 17:50 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DXjj9-0008DG-Il; Mon, 16 May 2005 13:50:03 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DXjj6-0008Bv-W1; Mon, 16 May 2005 13:50:01 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA16358; Mon, 16 May 2005 13:49:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DXjze-0005ik-Hu; Mon, 16 May 2005 14:07:09 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (64.102.124.12) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 May 2005 13:49:49 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j4GHnCnk007859; Mon, 16 May 2005 13:49:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.15]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 16 May 2005 13:49:43 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-mo-flags-01.txt
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 13:49:42 -0400
Message-ID: <8E296595B6471A4689555D5D725EBB212B349C@xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-mo-flags-01.txt
Thread-Index: AcVaO7qacjUC63UyRmyhTG/+d1ICtAAA8+pQ
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2005 17:49:43.0274 (UTC) FILETIME=[A41D24A0:01C55A3F]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, "Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com>, IPv6 WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

Exactly! 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stig Venaas [mailto:Stig.Venaas@uninett.no] 
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 1:21 PM
> To: Bernie Volz (volz)
> Cc: JINMEI Tatuya / ????; Pekka Savola; dhcwg@ietf.org; IPv6 
> WG; Ralph Droms (rdroms)
> Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Re: IPv6 WG Last 
> Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-ra-mo-flags-01.txt
> 
> Another reason they need to be only hints to the clients, is 
> that there
> might be many different types of clients on the same link. I 
> think there
> are many cases where you don't want to force all the clients to do the
> same. One thing is what information a client wants to obtain, 
> another is
> what it supports. Does the client do DHCP at all, does it 
> just do state-
> less, or does it do the full 3315.
> 
> Stig
> 

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg