IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] IPR statement related to draft-ietf-dhc-subscriber-id-X.txt

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 06 February 2004 18:48 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA09026 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:48:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ApB19-0002Va-H6 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:47:55 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i16IltYp009636 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:47:55 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ApB19-0002VL-CI for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:47:55 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA09013 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:47:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ApB17-0002Pl-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:47:53 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1ApB0B-0002N1-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:46:56 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ApAzL-0002KC-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:46:03 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ApAzJ-0002NZ-J6; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:46:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ApAzA-0002Ms-3U for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:45:52 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA08954 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:45:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ApAz7-0002J8-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:45:50 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1ApAyG-0002GS-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:44:56 -0500
Received: from toccata.fugue.com ([204.152.186.142]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ApAxO-0002Dh-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:44:02 -0500
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (dsl093-187-232.chi2.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.187.232]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FFE1B3AD2; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 12:32:42 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <200402061517.i16FH8pP020309@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com>
References: <200402061517.i16FH8pP020309@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <42FF6BAC-58D4-11D8-A6E8-000A95D9C74C@fugue.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IPR statement related to draft-ietf-dhc-subscriber-id-X.txt
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 12:42:48 -0600
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Feb 6, 2004, at 9:17 AM, Thomas Narten wrote:
> Understood. But one thing that I'm also trying to understand, is that
> Cisco also has IPR on some other drafts, but has not stated that they
> will license for free. (At least that is my understanding. I'm sure
> someone will correct me if I have that wrong.) E.g., see
> draft-ietf-dhc-agentopt-radius-03.txt, a document the WG has
> recommended advancement of.  I think it would be helpful to understand
> how the situation differs in this case.

I don't think the situation is any different.


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email