Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) OptionsforDHCPv6
Danny Mayer <mayer@ntp.org> Fri, 30 November 2007 03:38 UTC
Return-path: <dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxwiC-00013H-Ha; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:38:44 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxwiC-000136-42 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:38:44 -0500
Received: from mx04.gis.net ([208.218.130.12]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxwiB-00024K-QG for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:38:44 -0500
Received: from [10.10.10.101] ([63.209.224.211]) by mx04.gis.net; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:38:38 -0500
Message-ID: <474F8511.6070109@ntp.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:35:45 -0500
From: Danny Mayer <mayer@ntp.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: anthony.flavin@bt.com
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) OptionsforDHCPv6
References: <548EC156325C6340B2E85DF90CAE8586019A0008@E03MVB3-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
In-Reply-To: <548EC156325C6340B2E85DF90CAE8586019A0008@E03MVB3-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Cc: Mark_Andrews@isc.org, ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, mellon@fugue.com, brad@shub-internet.org, dhcwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
anthony.flavin@bt.com wrote: > Perhaps some other ISP's involved with the NTPWG would care to comment > on whether or not the poor practice of the past is still in place, or > being replaced with best practice (which is to install their own > servers, or reach an agreement for the use of somebody else's). I suspect that an ISP that is interested enough to be involved with the NTP WG will be running their own NTP servers. Danny _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Mark Andrews
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… TS Glassey
- RE: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… anthony.flavin
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Hui Deng
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Brian Utterback
- RE: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… anthony.flavin
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Mark Andrews
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Brad Knowles
- RE: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Brad Knowles
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Brad Knowles
- Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Re: Network Time Protocol (NT… Danny Mayer