IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05: (with COMMENT)

Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> Wed, 11 May 2016 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F88712D796; Wed, 11 May 2016 15:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EvOi_D2LVP3U; Wed, 11 May 2016 15:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from biz131.inmotionhosting.com (biz131.inmotionhosting.com [74.124.197.190]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF7B712D793; Wed, 11 May 2016 15:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cpe-97-99-50-102.tx.res.rr.com ([97.99.50.102]:49372 helo=Steves-MacBook-Air.local) by biz131.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>) id 1b0cEQ-002uUh-MT; Wed, 11 May 2016 15:03:55 -0700
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20160511173425.15223.72665.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <573370AC.9050408@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
Message-ID: <5733AC45.8060309@usdonovans.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 17:03:49 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <573370AC.9050408@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020206070607040503000807"
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz131.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - usdonovans.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: srdonovan@usdonovans.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: srdonovan@usdonovans.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/o6Bd-g3DoUA649Yn4v2rzUlJNz4>
Cc: draft-ietf-dime-drmp@ietf.org, dime-chairs@ietf.org, dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 22:03:59 -0000

I am in the process of updating the draft.  I hope to have a new version 
for review early next week.

Regards,

Steve

On 5/11/16 12:49 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Thanks Mirja and all for the discussion.
>
> Authors - if you're ready, please do go ahead now and update
> the draft based on all the discussion to date and we can then
> check back with the various ADs who've commented. (I think
> Alexey said he'd suggest a bit of text to address Mirja's
> concern, so please do check with him as you prepare the
> revision.)
>
> Cheers,
> S.
>
> On 11/05/16 18:34, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
>> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05: No Objection
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-drmp/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> I still think this part needs further clarification mostly regarding
>> applicability and maybe a warning as it could lead to starvation of
>> requests that do not define a priority, e.g. because there are not
>> supporting it (yet) while effectively having a higher priortiy than the
>> requests that they get starved by:
>> "When using DRMP priority information, Diameter nodes MUST use the
>>     default priority for transactions that do not have priority specified
>>     in a DRMP AVP."
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email