IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 12 May 2016 12:20 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F71212D9A5; Thu, 12 May 2016 05:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.297
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id syeV-IdlVQeA; Thu, 12 May 2016 05:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA1E412D9A6; Thu, 12 May 2016 05:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC518BE4D; Thu, 12 May 2016 13:20:21 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ab0wmsbFvN3x; Thu, 12 May 2016 13:20:20 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [192.168.2.145] (70-91-193-41-BusName-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.91.193.41]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C978BE51; Thu, 12 May 2016 13:20:15 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1463055616; bh=RbJKHbb7VUH7V9QLpPcTv80GbsfxCoUHhf6BSZYcvlM=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=CMT5nciGmuf249U2BOBTHpYD4uUjITo3f8oOSLJsueCFkz6VLkhjCXAUNWrJcPMTq UT7KhDpAmmSFFuO2odZZvDQJBbGrNhfFc9tpVS/1wGR3GQNm7Ae30PLy6EeNuCdY0a YF4eX9c303P57iUaHbH7HHa7pL4VD5R3B+AH0ErY=
To: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20160511173425.15223.72665.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <573370AC.9050408@cs.tcd.ie> <5733AC45.8060309@usdonovans.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <573474FD.20705@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 13:20:13 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5733AC45.8060309@usdonovans.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms090305040905010904050704"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/pRJrqYtwwm7sCEJGL7GK7SEhV-0>
Cc: draft-ietf-dime-drmp@ietf.org, dime-chairs@ietf.org, dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 12:20:29 -0000


On 11/05/16 23:03, Steve Donovan wrote:
> I am in the process of updating the draft.  I hope to have a new version
> for review early next week.

Great,
S

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Steve
> 
> On 5/11/16 12:49 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> Thanks Mirja and all for the discussion.
>>
>> Authors - if you're ready, please do go ahead now and update
>> the draft based on all the discussion to date and we can then
>> check back with the various ADs who've commented. (I think
>> Alexey said he'd suggest a bit of text to address Mirja's
>> concern, so please do check with him as you prepare the
>> revision.)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> S.
>>
>> On 11/05/16 18:34, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
>>> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
>>> draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05: No Objection
>>>
>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>>
>>>
>>> Please refer to
>>> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>>
>>>
>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-drmp/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> COMMENT:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> I still think this part needs further clarification mostly regarding
>>> applicability and maybe a warning as it could lead to starvation of
>>> requests that do not define a priority, e.g. because there are not
>>> supporting it (yet) while effectively having a higher priortiy than the
>>> requests that they get starved by:
>>> "When using DRMP priority information, Diameter nodes MUST use the
>>>     default priority for transactions that do not have priority
>>> specified
>>>     in a DRMP AVP."
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DiME mailing list
>>> DiME@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email