IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] draft-sunil-sankar-dispatch-sip-incr-00: comments and question

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Tue, 28 June 2016 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FF112B00F for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 07:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T4n7ULkFUj1V for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 07:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1ACA12D182 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 07:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1894; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1467122575; x=1468332175; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=5FlC2xShZWL1Y7hy3qSqyslOzkE7GCK/kUpmsFLznwg=; b=a7VWOtDpeG7FUk0eJN+pWuVNvwLZ65sRnmsZmsKtRbWZfb3OMy8Ir++b HE32CTBRgYrRhAoQJ4r8BVcwJEETUnm1H0nx+4nYT0JLXLnStQ0O2BGQP cEksn5wiYSTx6c+01bdxmnqpFhb8s4kdPlTtwvZZXLjFO6frpXiUbR0qM 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ASAgB/gnJX/4gNJK1bgz5WfQa6KoF7FwuFLEoCHIETOBQBAQEBAQEBZSeETAEBAQMBAQEBIBE6BAwLAgEIGAICJgICAiULFRACBAESiCgIDrJLkDIBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYEBhx4Igk6HQSuCLwWZAgGOOY8kj34BHjaDcG6IMX8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,541,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="291062457"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 28 Jun 2016 14:02:55 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u5SE2snh014131 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:02:54 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-004.cisco.com (64.101.220.144) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:02:53 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-004.cisco.com ([64.101.220.144]) by XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com ([64.101.220.144]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:02:53 -0400
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: "Sunil Kumar Sinha -X (sunsinha - SCARLET WIRELESS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED at Cisco)" <sunsinha@cisco.com>, DISPATCH list <dispatch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dispatch] draft-sunil-sankar-dispatch-sip-incr-00: comments and question
Thread-Index: AQHR0UXDhwB9+JGwHE6hRPheWX7ojg==
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:02:53 +0000
Message-ID: <D954ABAD-A6A6-4158-88AE-F5D7AD4AB1EA@cisco.com>
References: <3dfdc76b723c199cf9ca5ed97cb2f16e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3dfdc76b723c199cf9ca5ed97cb2f16e@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.110.222]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <9AB098932A008545B157B4E6BB9E164E@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/46hJ8spjsGfco12I8NdiVCrqpvQ>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] draft-sunil-sankar-dispatch-sip-incr-00: comments and question
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:03:01 -0000

Does Cisco or anyone else plan to implement this draft in their products? I’m skeptical this would improve performance over cached parsing approaches. 



> On Jun 13, 2016, at 9:51 PM, Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The following are a few comments concerning
> draft-sunil-sankar-dispatch-sip-incr-00.
> 
> Thanks,
> Brett
> 
> ------
> 
> 1) The draft should clarify the relation to SHOULD and MUST within other
> RFCs concerning header inclusion.  Section 6.1 appears to indicate that
> you can ignore MUST statements within other RFCs concerning the need to
> include a specific a header.  However, I'm currently unsure if section 4
> next-to-last sentence supports or conflicts with that mandate.
> 
> 2) You might want to reword section 4 to use normative language.
> 
> 3) How would this draft interact with RFC 4028 from refresh -versus-
> deactivation perspective?
> 
> 4) How would this draft interact with draft-ietf-insipid-session-id since
> the presence of the Session-ID is to help debug the call flow?
> 
> 5) You should clarify that transaction specific headers such as Supported,
> Require, Proxy-Require, and Content-Length need to be included again.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing list
> dispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email