Re: [dispatch] New Version of draft-vanelburg-dispatch-private-network-ind

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Tue, 29 October 2013 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E379C11E8288 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.242
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.242 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.195, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xbaqEhrrUY4N for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:96]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C8211E826D for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.36]) by qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id j1rF1m00Q0mv7h0592Xllk; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:31:45 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id j2Xl1m00D3ZTu2S3X2XlRs; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:31:45 +0000
Message-ID: <526FC6D1.5040109@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:31:45 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dispatch@ietf.org
References: <20130912005949.3447.42089.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <523124B0.2000305@ntt-at.co.jp> <CAHBDyN6oH7OYbq2E26Mo_7KOqx6JZ2mz3CWqQRpfoAXsyLb51A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN6oH7OYbq2E26Mo_7KOqx6JZ2mz3CWqQRpfoAXsyLb51A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1383057105; bh=8IPAm0l/6EpXzW9Sl0nrBt57fiIOpdkpBikghNzkaPw=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=XKSwwmzyV3e3c0U/fPsA2Z+zNZ/G9keYAqIXKve1zPHIIXOs5AppCVSt2bWgIOt7t GvmD9cK+opI+mBUclli+okrY6vODdT1RZ/WDuc+dQ03zpIlqQQeh0QHmDDE/HPL6Gh SVOSIhZDxDw1p/TeyElbgc+zM3EaLFLoq5FD34J0mC1OQRzJE6aNoeFOSHXrAYeNNr Gu6ZP9myYIvb679S5vMHukI7JdHbWoF4SW0H2CnzDr9m7fY8AHGlrA2s8oqmAaUaB4 mKxw4QKAj7MhzEt3tBQlnDAjpzm1RAgtAP1rK7zr5jbDbMTDw3t/HB8FMSQVFA+jyu BtdBAjV/RQ2gw==
Subject: Re: [dispatch] New Version of draft-vanelburg-dispatch-private-network-ind
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:32:02 -0000

A couple of additional nits.

On 10/29/13 10:11 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:

> - General: domains used in this document must use a reserved domain such
> as "example.com <http://example.com>" and must not use real domains.
> Thus, all occurrences of ericsson.com <http://ericsson.com> need to be
> changed to example.com <http://example.com>

Or foo.example.com

> NEW:
>
>     The private network indication defined in this document MUST only be used
>     in an environment where elements are trusted and where attackers are

delete the last "are"

>     do not have access to the protocol messages between those
>     elements.  Traffic protection between network elements can be
>     achieved by using IPsec and sometimes by physical protection of the
>     network.  In any case, the environment where the private network
>     indication will be used ensures the integrity and the confidentiality
>     of the contents of this header field.

	Thanks,
	Paul