Re: [dispatch] War of the Worlds (was Re: I-D Action: draft-malas-dispatch-sip-egress-route-00)

Henry Sinnreich <henry.sinnreich@gmail.com> Wed, 17 March 2010 04:19 UTC

Return-Path: <henry.sinnreich@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FD83A686E for <dispatch@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.342
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.342 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0+Dmd1bgTLM9 for <dispatch@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3663A687E for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyh4 with SMTP id 4so309320gyh.31 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:user-agent:date:subject:from :to:cc:message-id:thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type; bh=nm4lzvlbGrsi6992iiujo8TVyMaY7Ts+o5nCiE08+bs=; b=gPPtmCzseRE8fEdd8UM+ZkKQvCdpdT8IUIZ/D2s2yMfYOt/ATKxF9PAEPFH8e3EP0I 9+AiAjxLK4RtKw1E6YsdKqINTbJT4mk4kH+7I+r2upE4a04TwWrYhG/1W/kAtI+SnBWu qjUG/pFE0akgS3IxwLZJT1yy3P6Dvd6FC3Qsg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type; b=Idxg8dbLWGy7fgcteVjRQEWc+RINIGvzWIpEVQTvjPOmzzoj8uFYgN4CBVMjKrLwE1 f2MfbLsz67TpvQRTUAJHv4hlkgd4mnt7lCKvupSEzaOH+P8Po/OP+saQ/uiPKkvhaY8H Ow/YN4RY7pbTZ7nP3DA/93tc30JmQdPcSPLE0=
Received: by 10.101.187.3 with SMTP id o3mr411196anp.49.1268799571777; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.34] (cpe-76-184-253-10.tx.res.rr.com [76.184.253.10]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm2245188ywd.59.2010.03.16.21.19.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:19:27 -0500
From: Henry Sinnreich <henry.sinnreich@gmail.com>
To: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <C7C5C27F.D934%henry.sinnreich@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [dispatch] War of the Worlds (was Re: I-D Action: draft-malas-dispatch-sip-egress-route-00)
Thread-Index: AcrFiQgQw1kkq8FSS0OSa8heIJGjwA==
In-Reply-To: <368839EC-1BFD-4115-80DB-E3A9CE4678C3@softarmor.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3351626370_950792"
Cc: "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, Daryl Malas <D.Malas@cablelabs.com>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] War of the Worlds (was Re: I-D Action: draft-malas-dispatch-sip-egress-route-00)
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:19:57 -0000

This really sums up the enigma why the IETF should do work that contradicts
every principle of the Internet architecture and its engineering.

It may be useful to remember the  _solid_   track record of the  "stagnant
world"
* OSI 
* X4.00 mail 
* IN 
* AIN 
* ISDN 
* SONET/SDH 
* ATM 
* BISDN 
* H.323 
* current re-incarnations such as PSTN/SIP and other (avoiding flames
here)...
How many companies have disappeared building this stuff? Layoffs. Capital
destruction.

The other enigma is the tolerance to associate the IETF with the
reincarnations of these failures.

>I have long speculated that perhaps the best thing we can do is punt the
"stagnant world" stuff to a different forum.
>I seem to recall many times suggesting that SIP should just be moved to the ITU
so we can get on with building the Internet.
>I'd happily add ENUM to the same bucket.

Well said.

Thanks, Henry


On 3/16/10 5:49 PM, "Dean Willis" <dean.willis@softarmor.com> wrote:

> 
> On Mar 16, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
>> 
>> I disagree profoundly with characterizing Rosenberg's Modest Proposal as an
>> appropriate summary of the issues, as it gets the analysis precisely wrong.
>> It proposes completely abandoning the vibrant world as a lost cause, and
>> embracing the stagnant world as the only path forward. This isn't just
>> allowing collateral damage to the vibrant world for the sake of expediency
>> in stagnant world solutions -- it's a suggestion that we nuke the vibrant
>> world so it doesn't keep annoying people trying to develop stagnant
>> solutions.
>> 
> 
> I have long speculated that perhaps the best thing we can do is punt the
> "stagnant world" stuff to a different forum. I seem to recall many times
> suggesting that SIP should just be moved to the ITU so we can get on with
> building the Internet. I'd happily add ENUM to the same bucket.
> 
> The problem is that we might wake up one day and realize that the Internet has
> been turned off, and all we have left is a stagnant backwater of
> telecommunications boundaries established by fat-and-happy politicos eager to
> preserve their own domains.
> 
> The alternative, perhaps, is to embrace stagnation. Then add chlorine.
> 
> --
> Dean
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing list
> dispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch