IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] IETF 118 - do you have something for DISPATCH?

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Mon, 23 October 2023 10:40 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1285DC1516E1; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 03:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.808
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b="JvvSbs7Z"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="dZqJMbRn"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i5yK92tD-1FK; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 03:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86576C1519B1; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 03:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A475F5C027B; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 06:39:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 23 Oct 2023 06:39:31 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1698057571; x= 1698143971; bh=leZsPTipnYsYsjw4DLP3XCnXwEqZrjF+bwKRMI7NTnA=; b=J vvSbs7ZecggpmMZqFG5AN+koiQETVq0LSmeFooIHQn8TbjS9hklmpFLE8KkDDB5x ODq+WbMtghgRiSg1Qlnw5LC9BCHEXQUYzSM44yajSCUvCMKi6SNIoz/FZCNzIG0g il5iClU+1a45GIYcXRps/7KZYnng0/BcAKtu+2S0ccRtlctkw3IMHJB6ExPbnCJw xd8TNum3V+mReag7H79u3iO1IOEG2TwevdFgw6o1UEYq9vJDRCqzPjSqZfHQiuGK SB350XkgM/nHgpnTqebXPD20oCnKmOW38E8Lgr3NA03beTyJv2pGAxI3/UVONVRt suTId4U3ONen5/XNAmrtw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1698057571; x=1698143971; bh=leZsPTipnYsYs jw4DLP3XCnXwEqZrjF+bwKRMI7NTnA=; b=dZqJMbRnUgoeHXoS57WyWR7SRgR3G /7rg605dC2IsPJ1b1IiWd8VIIuO0t3HQURMngDGJhzx4aw50xeNaQDQF12HlySxI S3d3r7k0sdB6k7UKT6Ii76ADAk6/JQpMzN+KKK7WtYZw2dG9nBRQ7l9lm67VxMmt i2bitnLrXG/4OTzTrR22Lki3qu3LU9cQMS4RZrrwKQa/pnOZ4xtYHW5JTCKdiS2x 9oHeNekkrjR/45/Nnzl167s4Uyr/XaAKMrluTdi+IAAyqSiNFzVRfISPpqFDUpPX AfIIEJL+Enu1kySCGXFPeMmXrcaQ5iPeDasX1XXYDMTJbbYLcGnd9Xi+A==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Y002Zdv_ObCcbOmUgQBFnBy9NmoLq5-DPqPenL-OenDU9rwzWCYifg> <xme:Y002ZWfOajREHb3DPDZGGHLMV3gQwrzUpsYNLguFhNRMB8y9_1-uUxtq6rwJrD4QA 5rhvX315adwLJhVUBg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrkeeigddvlecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghr thhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudelueeftdfhgeeiieeikeekjedvjefgveduffegfedvffelveef keduieeikeelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Y002ZQzEPteQOpI9d4NtLJEWlPTuc4PO7wTbHwAnsByshtxMFSgleQ> <xmx:Y002ZUOtz3FY8Wm0Rv05uQoxfyEyR8X_oIJQK9fxaF8cNxe1kbblIw> <xmx:Y002Zd-7HhsH-u4b8hVnK8nx2eJhftp2_pi3k5YLoKZP-JX9hErpgA> <xmx:Y002ZZa174yuWKdVjhUYay6FX_eF4uedS9hzGlxHMh1gxUg0Heo6XQ>
Feedback-ID: ic129442d:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5FC8B234007E; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 06:39:31 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-1048-g9229b632c5-fm-20231019.001-g9229b632
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <bff6715c-0861-4647-96fb-385d21fbccaf@betaapp.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F7FEC59F-3264-43D2-8F32-DE4412263628@mnot.net>
References: <8866efbb55914ff3b3d2dac9ba52393f@huawei.com> <e7af4a430aeb42deb6f9de857d71b2f2@huawei.com> <258D2726-CF49-4675-8230-9548E2BD3E44@mnot.net> <AS1PR07MB86162B208AA31E4D08F30FD598D8A@AS1PR07MB8616.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <F7FEC59F-3264-43D2-8F32-DE4412263628@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 21:39:11 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot=40mnot.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
Cc: "Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)" <pengshuping=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, "dispatch-chairs@ietf.org" <dispatch-chairs@ietf.org>, "art-ads@ietf.org" <art-ads@ietf.org>, "tsv-ads@ietf.org" <tsv-ads@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/E_XoDdNPhj3sW6Jz3gRxuDeJr68>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] IETF 118 - do you have something for DISPATCH?
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:40:04 -0000

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023, at 18:39, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I would strongly suggest that we combine SECDISPATCH into DISPATCH and 
> make its scope ART, WIT, and SEC. There is already too much venue 
> shopping / confusion between SECDISPATCH and DISPATCH, and adding a 
> third (which your message implies will be necessary) will only add to 
> the chaos. Getting cross-area review is very healthy at early stages.

I'd have to agree.  I've seen the same presentation at both DISPATCH and SECDISPATCH now on several occasions.  And one occasion where it was the same topic at both of those meetings and another working group.  A cross-area DISPATCH group seems like a good idea.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email