Re: [dispatch] Announcing a MUC with RFC4575

[Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]>]

Yes, that looks good!

On 5/30/13 10:33 AM, Emil Ivov wrote:
> Thanks Peter,
> 
> I've just updated the security considerations but wanted to make sure
> they reflect what you said before resubmitting, so here they are:
> 
> https://github.com/emcho/grouptextchat-purpose/blob/master/draft-ivov-grouptextchat-purpose-02.txt
> 
> 
> Could you please confirm that this works for you?
> 
> Cheers,
> Emil
> 
> On 29.05.13, 00:21, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 4/23/13 8:10 PM, Emil Ivov wrote:
>>>> There it is then:
>>>>
>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ivov-grouptextchat-purpose
> 
> An additional security consideration might be opening another attack
> vector for the conference (e.g., chatroom flooding). Furthermore, an
> attack on the auxiliary chatroom might be easier (or harder) than an
> attack on the main conference depending on the security policies in
> effect. Emil, regarding such mismatches you might borrow some text
> from draft-ivov-xmpp-cusax, but I think it would also be helpful to
> describe the nature of the chatroom attack vector (you might find it
> helpful to look at Section 13 of XEP-0045, especially 13.6.)
> 
> Peter
> 
>>
>