IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] Announcing a MUC with RFC4575

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 23 April 2013 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1805921F9629 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ayHrRz4jK-KJ for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F8D21F9627 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ergon.local (unknown [71.237.13.154]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B769140E4B; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:08:44 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <5176CBA0.6000602@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:57:52 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
References: <51744F5B.8010506@jitsi.org> <5175A133.5040309@stpeter.im> <5175A9C6.9010707@alum.mit.edu> <8393F7ED-51FD-4CE1-B8A3-FD95EA185016@vidyo.com> <CAHBDyN7r8kuOyfUmzCeYa3dYM7ZqtdvfTvkF4QSkiDTSTfN02w@mail.gmail.com> <5176A9B9.3050105@jitsi.org> <CAHBDyN65C8oxdY3_hX46biFtENYF3dwhyqc_66mG6Wvo0RYQtw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN65C8oxdY3_hX46biFtENYF3dwhyqc_66mG6Wvo0RYQtw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>, "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Announcing a MUC with RFC4575
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:57:55 -0000

On 4/23/13 9:36 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
> wrote:
>> Hey Mary,
>> 
>> On 23.04.13, 16:50, Mary Barnes wrote:
>>> This would also be something useful for the XCON chat, which
>>> is defined in draft-boulton-xcon-session-chat (we will shortly
>>> be updating this and posting for discussion on this mailing
>>> list).  I think "grouptextchat" would work, although I don't
>>> find it particularly readable, but I don't think abbreviating
>>> is useful, so I don't have another suggestion.
>> 
>> I suppose I am once again missing something so I'd better ask :)
>> 
>> Are you saying that you would find a draft that defines the
>> value helpful for draft-boulton-xcon-session-chat or are you
>> planning on adding the definition in the draft itself?
>> 
>> The former could be quicker I suppose and I'd be happy to write
>> the document, but the latter also works for me.
> [MB] I agree with you.  I think we can write a simple doc to
> define this and it can be referenced by these other docs as
> necessary (since it isn't unique to any of these chat
> applications). [/MB]

+1

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email