IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] Announcing a MUC with RFC4575

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Wed, 24 April 2013 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A8921F8E79 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.657
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.657 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.319, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eF6QgzBZTdKy for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-f47.google.com (mail-oa0-f47.google.com [209.85.219.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CAD921F8E5F for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n9so2207235oag.20 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=BnSdxhGOcsZWgIBRZAlipKbfjBWQCCJFATV90JyMDNs=; b=dNctjEtgicDMWnYRmeumz/XYqUz6n7ExBxU9w4cGQ0bwfsSf8220WOse3Vcx0S4FIW N0XfOQa9xnvdmZ6YAbiyiFGC+MAL6SPU3Qc3YE4elv0NEf/EaVq+XOfH47zltz2cLGJ7 KVZ/Zv/0lxf4QgS8Qp0f2a2kFuaQEueIlVCtVbYterseP9urHDGhMBSi2WYzCwxDBfyS AAwco9ZxHfURsHEzPKUrB834Pc7KnyHmlaO6RFXjHdmOK1L9Nux0A4ID75S9XiCp0+6D J7UbqAY3V37HAPIlVBEyGb48JpKK8L+K82A/P9Zo7M0mEMFTnWg+/nVuaSMYfovr9zrJ rmFA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.59.197 with SMTP id b5mr2491913oer.4.1366839128164; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.41.225 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [128.89.253.75]
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN4Z+ZPoEG2zUwnT7NxBiXY6=PKwb2mWJgSzk0qaSeMQWg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <51744F5B.8010506@jitsi.org> <5175A133.5040309@stpeter.im> <5175A9C6.9010707@alum.mit.edu> <8393F7ED-51FD-4CE1-B8A3-FD95EA185016@vidyo.com> <CAHBDyN7r8kuOyfUmzCeYa3dYM7ZqtdvfTvkF4QSkiDTSTfN02w@mail.gmail.com> <5176A9B9.3050105@jitsi.org> <CAHBDyN65C8oxdY3_hX46biFtENYF3dwhyqc_66mG6Wvo0RYQtw@mail.gmail.com> <5176CBA0.6000602@stpeter.im> <51773F1B.3020907@jitsi.org> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB11349B2C1@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <CAHBDyN4Z+ZPoEG2zUwnT7NxBiXY6=PKwb2mWJgSzk0qaSeMQWg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:32:08 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgQHafYFyRatixRvt=BjKuqpq3NoSgspDP21xhuC82AMpA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0149d1b6b31ee304db2208d3"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkV7H2K8gxqp9k38dE30po0nV/ND7azk3C8br90Wtt1EAAHQ57WQ0R7SfF9wqxzUi8xbT9J
Cc: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, "rai-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rai-ads@tools.ietf.org>, "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Announcing a MUC with RFC4575
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:32:09 -0000

That sounds fine to me.
--Richard


On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
> <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 23, 2013, at 8:10 PM, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> wrote:
> >
> >> There it is then:
> >>
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ivov-grouptextchat-purpose
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Emil
> >
> > I like it.
> >
> > Now how would people like to dispatch this? My preference would probably
> be if one of the authors could talk to ADs about AD sponsoring this and if
> they seem like they might be OK with that, just do a quick call on the
> dispatch list for any objects then send it that way.
> >
> > Cullen
> [MB] My thoughts exactly.  I've cc'ed the RAI ADs to see if they have
> any issues with this approach. [/MB]
>
> Mary
>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dispatch mailing list
> > dispatch@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email