IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] Announcing a MUC with RFC4575

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Wed, 24 April 2013 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C0A21F930E for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 07:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XrXf+IqdKKgF for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 07:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qe0-f44.google.com (mail-qe0-f44.google.com [209.85.128.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1255521F92C4 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 07:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f44.google.com with SMTP id w7so1247714qeb.17 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 07:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z2OZ7Jk9s6IELLoV/e7I0peSTT9NcMeyIg/hLbl0Ldk=; b=ut/giBy/DIFTOzEHDRrlOKtjZNC2OCOtLji7zOPRVyk6VlhP7+2aOg8PxiOlPFvskF LhBxXIU8vVneHvO08okvCNzzyzxBpkXZW8o8itKbA/UynT358p95cQ+z/89rTXi1V3T9 jnznbRobQhqK2+iAyEneB7CWE+8tPNsjYGobMQB6X+H3XB/WIzF0M473isxonfutYYJz itYj2zzhi5t5dbuqWRkVuk89Px25AxuqMbt5IC6/ulmGKMmOtNYCzaZYDmjRykyolP97 EKXzFyxsg6QUUGZg2IqIwr+YpHwyhaZWjyJLp6yZmzhpyexCutsamJv3s+sxBV9WQkUw N+ww==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.53.11 with SMTP id k11mr30657079qag.3.1366813930672; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 07:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.117.163 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 07:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB11349B2C1@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <51744F5B.8010506@jitsi.org> <5175A133.5040309@stpeter.im> <5175A9C6.9010707@alum.mit.edu> <8393F7ED-51FD-4CE1-B8A3-FD95EA185016@vidyo.com> <CAHBDyN7r8kuOyfUmzCeYa3dYM7ZqtdvfTvkF4QSkiDTSTfN02w@mail.gmail.com> <5176A9B9.3050105@jitsi.org> <CAHBDyN65C8oxdY3_hX46biFtENYF3dwhyqc_66mG6Wvo0RYQtw@mail.gmail.com> <5176CBA0.6000602@stpeter.im> <51773F1B.3020907@jitsi.org> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB11349B2C1@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:32:10 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN4Z+ZPoEG2zUwnT7NxBiXY6=PKwb2mWJgSzk0qaSeMQWg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "rai-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rai-ads@tools.ietf.org>, "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Announcing a MUC with RFC4575
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:32:16 -0000

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
<fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 23, 2013, at 8:10 PM, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> wrote:
>
>> There it is then:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ivov-grouptextchat-purpose
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Emil
>
> I like it.
>
> Now how would people like to dispatch this? My preference would probably be if one of the authors could talk to ADs about AD sponsoring this and if they seem like they might be OK with that, just do a quick call on the dispatch list for any objects then send it that way.
>
> Cullen
[MB] My thoughts exactly.  I've cc'ed the RAI ADs to see if they have
any issues with this approach. [/MB]

Mary

>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing list
> dispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email