IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] Draft: CBUS (Condition-based URI Subscription) requirements draft - draft-holmberg-dispatch-cbus-00.txt

"Dale Worley" <dworley@nortel.com> Wed, 27 May 2009 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <dworley@nortel.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2C63A6A7E for <dispatch@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2009 14:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vf7HcebwyEQq for <dispatch@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2009 14:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcars04e.nortel.com (zcars04e.nortel.com [47.129.242.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973E23A6F5F for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2009 14:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com (casmtp.ca.nortel.com [47.140.202.46]) by zcars04e.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id n4RLxES20374; Wed, 27 May 2009 21:59:14 GMT
Received: from [47.16.90.165] ([47.16.90.165]) by zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 27 May 2009 18:00:20 -0400
From: Dale Worley <dworley@nortel.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF0D234264@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF0D234264@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Nortel Networks
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 18:00:19 -0400
Message-Id: <1243461619.9392.9.camel@victoria-pingtel-com.us.nortel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-5.fc8)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 May 2009 22:00:20.0206 (UTC) FILETIME=[86E2E0E0:01C9DF16]
Cc: dispatch@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Draft: CBUS (Condition-based URI Subscription) requirements draft - draft-holmberg-dispatch-cbus-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:58:45 -0000

On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 14:45 +0200, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> I've submitted a draft which proposes SIP requirements for CBUS, based
> on work ongoing in OMA.
> 
> (The most likely protocol output is going to be a new event package,
> and some mechanism to provide conditions to the CBUS server).
> 
> The document can also be found in:
> 
> http://users.piuha.net/cholmber/drafts/draft-holmberg-dispatch-cbus-00.txt

As far as I can tell, the functionality is a pure request/response
protocol.  As there are quite a number of request/response protocols out
there, is it useful to embed this in SIP?

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email