Re: [dispatch] Draft: CBUS (Condition-based URI Subscription) requirements draft - draft-holmberg-dispatch-cbus-00.txt

Reading this draft, I am wondering if this actually has anything to do 
with SIP?  (Other than the fact that OMA chose to work on it, and 
decided SIP was the right solution space.)

It appears that the client is looking for some "servers" (which may be 
people) which meet certain constraints.  I am as likely to want xmpp: 
URIs, or even HTTP: URIs, as SIP: URIs (should I say TEL:?) for the 
cases that I can imagine based on the example in the draft.

This seems an interesting general application.  Unless we really want to 
turn SIP into the next HTTP: (REST over HTTP as a general application 
infrastructure), I am slightly confused.

Yours,
Joel

Christer Holmberg wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've submitted a draft which proposes SIP requirements for CBUS, based 
> on work ongoing in OMA.
> 
> (The most likely protocol output is going to be a new event package, and 
> some mechanism to provide conditions to the CBUS server).
> 
> The document can also be found in:
> 
> http://users.piuha.net/cholmber/drafts/draft-holmberg-dispatch-cbus-00.txt 
> <http://users.piuha.net/cholmber/drafts/draft-holmberg-dispatch-cbus-00.txt> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing list
> dispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch