Re: [dispatch] DISPATCH-78 topics - Alert URNs

[Laura Liess <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

Dale is right. We need a face2face meeting again.

Thanks,
Laura

2010/6/14 Gonzalo Camarillo <[e-mail]>:
> Hi,
>
> if you need face-to-face time for this, go ahead talk to the DISPATCH
> chairs so that you can either get a slot within the DISPATCH session or,
> alternatively, have an ad-hoc meeting. If we managed to charter the WG
> in time, we would have a WG meeting instead.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Gonzalo
>
> On 14/06/2010 5:37 AM, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Gonzalo Camarillo [[e-mail]]
>>
>> yes, Mary's description is correct. The process is as follows. Once we
>> agreed on the charter, I requested the IESG to review it. This charter
>> will be discussed in the next IESG telechat (the coming Thursday),
>> actually. Once the IESG is happy with it, the next step will be to have
>> an IETF-wide review. After that, we will be able to charter the WG.
>>
>> In any case, as we have said a number of times, proponents of a
>> particular piece of work should not stop working on it while we charter
>> their WG. They are encouraged to continue making progress in parallel
>> with the chartering process.
>> ________________________________________
>>
>> That is all fine, but what are the implications regarding getting a time slot at Maastricht?  There seem to be two choices:  a slot within Dispatch, or a separately scheduled Salud session.  What we do not want to get stuck with is not being able to get time in Dispatch (because a charter has been proposed) and not being able to get a separate session (because the charter hasn't gone through all the approval steps), as that would prevent any session at  Maastricht.
>>
>> Dale
>
>