Re: [dispatch] DISPATCH-78 topics - Alert URNs

[Gonzalo Camarillo <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

if you need face-to-face time for this, go ahead talk to the DISPATCH
chairs so that you can either get a slot within the DISPATCH session or,
alternatively, have an ad-hoc meeting. If we managed to charter the WG
in time, we would have a WG meeting instead.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

On 14/06/2010 5:37 AM, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
> ________________________________________
> From: Gonzalo Camarillo [[e-mail]]
> 
> yes, Mary's description is correct. The process is as follows. Once we
> agreed on the charter, I requested the IESG to review it. This charter
> will be discussed in the next IESG telechat (the coming Thursday),
> actually. Once the IESG is happy with it, the next step will be to have
> an IETF-wide review. After that, we will be able to charter the WG.
> 
> In any case, as we have said a number of times, proponents of a
> particular piece of work should not stop working on it while we charter
> their WG. They are encouraged to continue making progress in parallel
> with the chartering process.
> ________________________________________
> 
> That is all fine, but what are the implications regarding getting a time slot at Maastricht?  There seem to be two choices:  a slot within Dispatch, or a separately scheduled Salud session.  What we do not want to get stuck with is not being able to get time in Dispatch (because a charter has been proposed) and not being able to get a separate session (because the charter hasn't gone through all the approval steps), as that would prevent any session at  Maastricht.
> 
> Dale