Re: [dispatch] DISPATCH-78 topics - Alert URNs

[<[e-mail]>]

Hi Mary,

Thanks a lot.

Laura
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [e-mail] 
>[mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes
>Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 7:13 PM
>To: Laura Liess
>Cc: Robert Sparks; DISPATCH; Gonzalo Camarillo
>Subject: Re: [dispatch] DISPATCH-78 topics - Alert URNs
>
>Hi Laura,
>
>We did not consider this topic for pre-IETF-78 focus for the DISPATCH
>WG because the ADs are already in the process of preparing the charter
>for approval by the IESG, as I understood Gonzalo's emails on the
>topic.   I'll let ADs discuss the timeline for the chartering and
>really it would be up to them as to whether a meeting agenda slot
>would be requested for the topic.
>
>The current model we've been using is that past topics that have been
>agreed to be chartered have already been "dispatched" per se, per the
>summaries in the wiki:
>http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dispatch/trac/wiki
>
>Thanks,
>Mary.
>
>
>
>
>On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Laura Liess
><[e-mail]> wrote:
>> Hi Mary, Gonzalo,
>>
>> What about the Alert-Info URN?  We had a lot of discussion about the
>> charter and name, my opinion was that we had consensus on 
>the charter.
>> Dale would chair the WG.  I intend to submit a new draft version by
>> the end of June.
>> I also sent to you an e-mail some time ago asking for a time slot for
>> discussion in Masstricht. Is it anything I missed to do to get agenda
>> time?
>>
>> Thanks a lot
>> Laura
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2010/6/8 Mary Barnes <[e-mail]>:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Per the reminder posted on the ML on May 4th and as listed on the
>>> DISPATCH WG wiki, charter proposals for the topics to be
>>> handled/dispatched prior to and at IETF-78 were due on May 31st.
>>>
>>> We received charter proposals (problem 
>statements/deliverables) for the
>>> following, with links to most recent charter proposals and 
>discussion threads.
>>>
>>> o Session-ID:  updated charter proposal available
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg01967.html
>>>
>>> o Telepresence:  updated charter proposal available
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg01936.html
>>>
>>> o VIPR:  charter proposal
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg01930.html
>>>
>>> o TEL URI WG proposal:  discussion to focus on problem 
>statement and scope
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg01920.html
>>>
>>> The above items are the current targets for IETF-78 
>discussions.  Based
>>> on those discussions, agenda time will be allocated, items 
>dispatched
>>> and adhocs scheduled as appropriate. Note, that the minimum time we
>>> would allocate to a topic is 30 minutes and some may warrant 45
>>> minutes. If we schedule adhocs, we will try to have those announced
>>> around the time the agenda is finalized.
>>>
>>> The following items have also been discussed on the mailing 
>list, but
>>> are not yet ready for dispatching:
>>>
>>> o NGN Reason: Some interest. Needs more discussion and scoping.
>>> 
>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jesske-dispatch-reason-in
>-responses/
>>> 
>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jesske-dispatch-req-reaso
n-in-responses/
>>>
>>> o PAN - wait for more energy
>>> 
>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lawrence-sipforum-provider-alias/
>>>
>>> o  ACH - ACH analysis draft to happen as part of BLISS wind down
>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bliss-ach-analysis/
>>>
>>> o  ACH - HTTP API docs - need some hallway discussions
>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yusef-dispatch-ach-rest-api/
>>>
>>> o  Media security - needs additional ML discussion
>>> 
>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dawes-dispatch-mediasec-p
arameter/
>>>
>>> o Communication diversion and barring notification - 
>feedback thus far
>>> needs to be considered - i.e, problem statement to be clarified and
>>> alternate solutions to be consider (Note: IPR on the communication
>>> diversion draft)
>>> 
>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-avasarala-dispatch-comm-d
iv-notification/
>>> 
>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/-avasarala-dispatch-comm-barrin
g-notification/
>>>
>>>
>>> As a reminder, the following are the cutoffs for drafts, so 
>please make
>>> sure that any drafts relevant to the topic are submitted 
>prior to those
>>> deadlines:
>>> * - 00 documents:  July 5th (< 4 weeks)
>>> * all other documents: July 12th (< 5 weeks)
>>>
>>> Please keep in mind that the focus of discussions should be 
>the problem
>>> statement, scope and proposed deliverables for the topic.
>>>
>>> As a reminder, items can be dispatched without being 
>discussed at a f2f
>>> meeting and the most effective way to achieve this is to 
>have problem
>>> statements, scope of topics and any relevant documents available for
>>> discussion, rather than documents focusing on solutions.
>>>
>>> Please, let the chairs know if there are any concerns.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mary Barnes and Cullen Jennings
>>> DISPATCH WG chairs
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dispatch mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
>>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>dispatch mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
>