IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dispatch] Datachannel Hackathon at IETF 101 ?

T H Panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk> Wed, 24 January 2018 11:28 UTC

Return-Path: <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C0012DA3D for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 03:28:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YoO-QRrUo_Vp for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 03:28:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp002.apm-internet.net (smtp002.apm-internet.net [85.119.248.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FCD812DA29 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 03:28:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 30499 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2018 11:28:04 -0000
X-APM-Authkey: 255286/0(159927/0) 679
Received: from unknown (HELO zimbra003.verygoodemail.com) (85.119.248.218) by smtp002.apm-internet.net with SMTP; 24 Jan 2018 11:28:04 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9751C18A04B3; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:28:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from zimbra003.verygoodemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra003.verygoodemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id DkWt6Cdyh6Cv; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:28:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [192.67.4.33] (unknown [192.67.4.33]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7286C18A0493; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:28:04 +0000 (GMT)
From: T H Panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Message-Id: <4B65832E-7BD6-4515-9C09-0C392BC85BC9@westhawk.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:28:03 +0000
Cc: dispatch@ietf.org
To: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/z9psmkekkVnj0OxshrGIWGJDxPc>
Subject: [dispatch] Datachannel Hackathon at IETF 101 ?
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:28:11 -0000

There has been talk over on the w3c list about the scarcity and unsuitability of free-standing WebRTC datachannel implementations.

I wonder if this is a suitable target for the IETF 101 hackathon? 

The challenge would be to throw up one or 2 free standing datachannel implementations based on existing open
source with APIs that might suit authors of networked games or SFUs.

Comments? Thoughts?

T.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email