Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 12 July 2019 00:54 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE8D120155 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=TWcTw6L5; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=DNZGOgo1
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id djQjpmZtjRGK for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F50E1200C7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:54:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 43488 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2019 00:54:43 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=a9de.5d27da53.k1907; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=x/kE4c+rRYVqARHAD/nwbndCI1q3LLnN0RqwfC8+e2Y=; b=TWcTw6L5uZp+pwBloCBJrRyzI0hK3p65Z4POQgPLvTfy8GFXGploE8W3OTu/RWnMBUMJgUQxOODSz4y3dqn1NIjzNnhys/vjev2oXagszGKSKS97saj81GLtvLxHzpC4j6T2DlZXa6ykd5K3KwVud3U/P75NH3pX1CDDYqj7JgJ6YpDjr/dqLQaPEK+YJr4ay3oChKzZSX7EmmWmJgzNopNWAdd2TMRLFIZQqPmuZBGhOUtH6uSQpPFckD8c7mAO
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=a9de.5d27da53.k1907; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=x/kE4c+rRYVqARHAD/nwbndCI1q3LLnN0RqwfC8+e2Y=; b=DNZGOgo1E47aplxG7GSCY5NsHvnhvGxe91yFiWb2olto+Ffpn5+JUIGNYGNdJ1+Es9legmvnFIdhoaDQplqLXVlVWVHa4TUN1wH3/x3oGMpCzSFp1rw4Dd//4JWkA2F13hmNFRly5An1gB/mQUNeEPtvzRygOoZId8E57+9tBFTewx4blR1CZWdWP0UiQfjq+rPr/198Q0T0q5vIa9y63YE4EVmp8d/4GrpRITkK5xIuFZ/yF7OzUK5DPXPSZXmz
Received: from ary.local ([71.59.64.39]) by imap.iecc.com ([64.57.183.75]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP; 12 Jul 2019 00:54:43 -0000
Received: by ary.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2A664499982; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 20:54:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 11 Jul 2019 20:54:42 -0400
Message-Id: <20190712005443.2A664499982@ary.local>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: shollenbeck@verisign.com
In-Reply-To: <3a6e6f9ac98c4e60af1075760efde86d@verisign.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/2AIp6oZmPMeqVxGOHcY1ct_iv7E>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:54:48 -0000

In article <3a6e6f9ac98c4e60af1075760efde86d@verisign.com>; you write:
>> I don't plan any changes except for those in response to last call comments.
>> Unless I get direction otherwise, I don't plan any updates until after last call is
>> over.
>>
>> Please review this one.
>
>Repeating what I suggested earlier:
>
>https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/1jAgGtNiyR3YuvJg1dciWVHU2Pk

That seems OK to me.  We don't need to say anything specifically to
ICANN.  Should PSD turn out to be popular, this will be an input to an
ICANN process to allow the PSD record at the top of a TLD zone.


R's,
John