Re: [dmarc-ietf] Display address, was Mandatory Sender Authentication

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Wed, 12 June 2019 09:14 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E3512010F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 02:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J0YYti3smQpR for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 02:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x12d.google.com (mail-it1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55A8C120077 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 02:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id n189so9442660itd.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 02:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dFLXLEQgopFDvr6ha9bXJTcES+JWf922aAwPspoOkwA=; b=VVx/Gizue+KTXKx3OOfCY1v3bVdd5fZz9P8K+hKwhVJn7oh+bE6AE1zJX3JMseqnkP IAYI2j08xnesxla4rWwKT88DxK6dxb+Grr5dt/H3Q1iWkgLYUSVS0tr1DD9OtnDxpqkM fBSz9ITNoU+657aphOy+4V8Oet213+3QNCA/I=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dFLXLEQgopFDvr6ha9bXJTcES+JWf922aAwPspoOkwA=; b=XORgpnnsxXAj9b/GnVSQoRgSaTkSqw0EzRJiN+VfkSc346wJuuiB43A8BCesRVhZ7z omT2NmyFabp7+K9eI7PuLN4FSz8uzTJVYmnkWvHaJl1Aa7ZfvkFQKOmrflCoRIjdNtJg 4pIpMNWKcNphi4GIPVjc2U53DCMfWSNzO4FBedYX20ARJ1XT7KMxGbMPiWePsTbnkicG ievX+IgEPQdM8T+hoHCVR7vHYpmQ5rvYjSd5l4KihfcDfWhOZYlx75qL87BzHti9v+bB cqab5H8FGu/5LhxZwO2w44HTavKKD9vS4DFw+bTOHmSvQVKerJgxIhngJCdHrNXbjan1 m69w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU29c0JxF4kMIgBSyUyCWrQYd/z1nXdUUpp7VBMFEwpsQurR8Te G4pNm6vtJwgR7dQZHQIUNyqaQAxaigs/EHh72ZBgBpRNhFdwQ/I2
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzXqTl6tCY3toC4+biYiEPk558e/CCBXQw5UakGes4Bb18ll13nya+4ET890m6wdf3ssmALjZ+Ygm7q1qbIQ/Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:504b:: with SMTP id m72mr20710511itb.63.1560330865397; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 02:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190603142956.66B31120252@ietfa.amsl.com> <45cdc0da-5243-3a62-b217-8d5e4ea9ea11@dcrocker.net> <941abdbf28684283b972f69f25876220@bayviewphysicians.com> <5524dbb3-27ff-4aa8-aaf0-fc3a3fc23418@dcrocker.net> <1df2cc6b-c169-59ca-08f6-dadc06a702c6@tana.it> <1e096404-6b00-8896-0b79-841c243cacec@dcrocker.net> <7f8692bb-6b80-455e-f030-731f3ae36b58@tana.it> <98411dd3-b22e-9893-94a7-0f3d3eafa5d7@dcrocker.net> <c200c4fd-e17b-f36d-0cc2-5f6a1c709315@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <c200c4fd-e17b-f36d-0cc2-5f6a1c709315@tana.it>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 17:14:13 +0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1qDiup+YdpcemvGcwEG4XFSD_eHFhjLiOfJak43irkzmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f6ebf7058b1cd69a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/H1RYvpe56m6VGcH4Z4vWThIAIFg>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Display address, was Mandatory Sender Authentication
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 09:14:29 -0000

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 4:58 PM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:

>
> Well, I personally use it and sometimes find it useful.[†]  For a better
> statistics, I have a DKIM add-on whose purpose is just to display some
> authentication status.  With 10,107 users, it ranks 61st of 1,339 in
> Thunderbird's most popular extensions.
>
> [†] I tag _nopass_ messages not matching /^Authentication-Results:.*pass/
> and
> color them gray in the thread pane.  Many of them can be deleted w/o
> opening.
> (But then I have more pass'es than DMARC provides for.)
>

Are you suggesting that you are a good proxy for a "typical" user of any
random MUA?

Incredulously,
  Kurt