IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate Reporting - "Not Evaluated" result

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Wed, 05 October 2022 13:48 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47505C14F719 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 06:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=tana.it header.b=SdSl5zmS; dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it header.b=BZ280x9B
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ApVrp1Ut1jbe for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 06:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 853B6C14CF12 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 06:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=epsilon; t=1664977675; bh=V7RI30CiN9eFaA0rdQGR1hSdvw8UiUzJm7FLHP1XiIU=; h=Author:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=SdSl5zmSKM3T7y3225+DRfqM3ammlPn5SD91QyElShmbWVPUmBCtHgNHWG4Yav36T YBdQr5rnpAfZqIEDA4bDw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1664977675; bh=V7RI30CiN9eFaA0rdQGR1hSdvw8UiUzJm7FLHP1XiIU=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=BZ280x9B1vcVHWGb+b9nsBFozdptBjsYonRZeJh5wOUzReXZCfK1EqQHfLJGl2WSM H8AwwvvAWWkSc/8YXMUtPp+5jXvGrBy5rIs+V4bWQoJrjHKQUonqcXD4iEhCN46TjI 5EUhEqg+sY+nOfomnaWV6CMCuEdLp0H98qq0tJNc6QilwQmEvuPH++RW40nOH
Original-Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate Reporting - "Not Evaluated" result
Author: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC0E6.00000000633D8B0B.00003F9E; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 15:47:55 +0200
Message-ID: <77b64c50-a508-bf15-7a9d-b8527256e92d@tana.it>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 15:47:55 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <165046214335.10055.16398898629460366752@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAH48ZfxZOq68=P-Qxjvjk1c8PxWAWDvaBPPQcb4DWmd6cL=u4Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ4XoYen6n06L1UBqzu9nr2jCC7v_-GOAdJXMzCks6d-AaKqUA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH48ZfzVt=+yoj280VxL_SV+YM4C7eqMWhL=41YpVybaPmLcLg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHej_8mgKjpo6DDbOS9bBdTarThKOa9F55QBtrM6G-oq1YfX+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYjYY4OvShqACWPz0vdJcAubdU1csFFVSkqzsReZSZxuw@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB43514940B87730CC9D476AACF75B9@MN2PR11MB4351.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAL0qLwb=1CZN6s2QzWJGFeO3=iPWZ-eS=7hvi4B6jhuh+hLJ0w@mail.gmail.com> <8ab0943b-9805-1a0e-528d-9cf45f2eaf9c@tana.it> <CAH48ZfzM2J0_RizqESbFSm3ASfc2x6nsdxUXWEWO+4g2vXsz+g@mail.gmail.com> <38BC22D3-3A29-47E0-9E51-DD862FDD4947@wordtothewise.com> <CAH48Zfxf8X+77xnBe2Ah8WCZ9vHxt5--tN4wwO5YBDkJXUguAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <CAH48Zfxf8X+77xnBe2Ah8WCZ9vHxt5--tN4wwO5YBDkJXUguAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/HVAQkXh12irehMUj0uInUkvpfSA>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate Reporting - "Not Evaluated" result
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:48:19 -0000

On Wed 05/Oct/2022 03:13:28 +0200 Douglas Foster wrote:
> Time for some data collection:
> 
> [...]
> 
> What are the maximum number of signatures ever observed on a single message?


I enable logging messages with more than 4 signatures.  That's easy to grep in 
old logs.  I found 7 messages since January having 6 signatures each.  They 
were all from the same individual.  I still found one of them:

Authentication-Results: wmail.tana.it;
   dkim=permerror header.d="@";
   dkim=permerror header.d=localhost;
   dkim=neutral (test key, signature verification failed) header.d=fladi.at;
   dkim=permerror header.d=openservices.at;
   dkim=permerror header.d=qraz.at;
   dkim=permerror header.d=firedata.at


Best
Ale
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email