IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reversing modifications from mailing lists

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Sun, 28 November 2021 23:38 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468AD3A09AC for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:38:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.852, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rNuJUTi6Xh5L for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:38:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD9D13A09A8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:38:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id x7so11195851pjn.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:38:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PP/5eAJbAmDI+V9GrD7BPRrSVba4Q1LLUe4Qy9gH9Rg=; b=Niz922iAj3iwaPzZAFntXozYc7vJ7YJE5RFLq8gZE61JuMnbLuFNAyLxEc5xhfsGhK ADBXMR+8wS1EdeRPohR9JPeUjseFUsK68HEH2giHkCAgdLhTOYu7g8IOZiDwQosz5mgF HxzhXNLxkzw3smsm1F0bcIDl5JpMtp+hf0Rp1anSbNOm/W2On22zorILk2sp3z6Rv5h3 4dLi30OgZcykVjyCVeXrFuorHGeTZwmPxaW+e4XrRSQ3D3jBJvobV5YfqD4YzBf+f4QI UdMS64JF/dSzvv4EcG3N5x4JMm1+xpZT7i6MztK+Qc8CyUQs2ZCCfBeIt2cWJWL7Gkv0 Wjng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PP/5eAJbAmDI+V9GrD7BPRrSVba4Q1LLUe4Qy9gH9Rg=; b=Q03h1Hr/7genK7Nqg/PgCuJ14+s0Vqcawu2H8Zt3HLJjG6kmmm8tGmdMn4OmyKsHzT V4g/QVT8nB7u4DTB/nUIU8BGys9ToQOL1VxLjvgTFC6uT2zKJUyUWTylrVgUjhyJdCUx 2eKC9qGvXt6S223ZbsaW/ncFRLfeCm6Od1OOleOpBzWYNhV2BGvXMcLSICTETdo6yXEq +M13/FIi7CzRxUheYo2qDWyMsjhEXMMu7NtvU0CfFSuBtYuGfJRQLpG+OYRxmnm6NiDP lPMDsWoyq6+Hzp8FGxcDqtrzRg5erVXk1IMLCu48IiuxpxULlFVGf25yaxNdsWusQZzQ YKXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531LAj+DNV1CywlZrvZj0jcpIitEcMW/yYp5Pt/mEHlZvClEUMkM V7W0lGgv0c5s/iW5eRUZDLxELnOQ0Rg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzUpDlvyDr0p4Z1KWwlmrf2Kp9hmw+pTRIdACBCQcbB3m8Ltihr6W8Si9kQZNhQ/TVwXLTIPg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2093:b0:142:7dff:f7de with SMTP id d19-20020a170903209300b001427dfff7demr56436535plc.75.1638142731678; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:38:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.101] (c-73-170-122-71.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.170.122.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h186sm14214638pfg.64.2021.11.28.15.38.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:38:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <bda08400-36a1-19fb-f17e-f3bd66e6c3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:38:49 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2
Content-Language: en-US
To: Wei Chuang <weihaw=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <CAAFsWK23GGfe+uSyPqa2wxFgRn3mk7G9ajtjfz6cKw-FaoFM_A@mail.gmail.com> <20211126042946.6F86F3091B76@ary.local> <01S6OJDEJX3O005PTU@mauve.mrochek.com> <CAAFsWK27b=SBnUfdpTUq7n6p9nZ9E=ddkB+krEa_wYbZWFcksw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAFsWK27b=SBnUfdpTUq7n6p9nZ9E=ddkB+krEa_wYbZWFcksw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/J05smsoMh0zUdctSR0ZBESHPC5s>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reversing modifications from mailing lists
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 23:38:57 -0000

On 11/28/2021 3:31 PM, Wei Chuang wrote:
> What type of concern do you have?  Is it algorithmic complexity?  Or 
> runtime or header size overhead?

Biggest concern, for changing anything that has a significant installed 
base of use and users, is their willingness to make the changes.

They have to see a compelling case for the time, effort and expense.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
dcrocker@gmail.com
408.329.0791

Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
Information & Planning Coordinator
American Red Cross
dave.crocker2@redcross.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email