Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reversing modifications from mailing lists

Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com> Tue, 30 November 2021 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <weihaw@google.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF59D3A1421 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:00:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DIO0AdIhtrhk for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:59:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12e.google.com (mail-il1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 777A43A1449 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:59:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id z8so11861753ilu.7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:59:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ynRkKEdX1zWqBoH/i7bSnjamL+FdXzS8JgTBE3G3WLQ=; b=Kni1QpqJjI2miLwSyHF/0dqfBfchY/Sk8aWehkqoZ6eVbNtzeKMDgzFwInL2uq2Vin GCASaQg92qz4S8RVi5HgN7wZ45bvoEtlPKn5pWAXyEDlAqnesFw/fVT7Kvsi7Us3UVzY 5LsXCG+qJPwMSVH0Flqk78mx34wIOtTBTWYJtuUki2BDXXhmtgLnbPFeDwflP28/9fX/ VpEcFB3a4lB3gHkdNw5ThXUiT+0cuc+cQ3BIkt3hEtrG/FimXVNkF+vl5ahphIWx8phn Fpwg7EvRXwMYBkbsihEO0J499uKj1ivTNfbIQ9Lx+PUHUS29kITSnfTx+vaZiwGf1OUP uO5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ynRkKEdX1zWqBoH/i7bSnjamL+FdXzS8JgTBE3G3WLQ=; b=ytRjF/HIJE6YthNLWoo+EJnS5IrU72054G90bx83b2K5gKK4DJK01qA1npLFpfaSNA OQUkQoSlrR20vzd/nO5rz7/HNYEbCiOar+X/lnCBPuwFTSiAIUJS0jFGzpxM3uDosSfC fYVfoxNIis8y0d8pBpJjgT3QhAvvdcEmrhFGNAk9F6GL5QnPa2OXQW1Ue+Twc37ZNkgt UiW+pa06sQiRvrgLZ2PmyPrDRA2BQ9nsfS8P/GYj0YAe547/GhnxGaaQugRWfQixh0HO BozCwFBwEvlDep7yWfvmiIVjO1cxsoGfmqjU3vqDx0UF9Bh+JL6zmhdkL62lXDbZyFp9 f+Qg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+W87ijgtgw7Y7iSLzSTIgE540BFYdXYxByjAeWaJd/YdfGX92 0DXXgaaOmk4IXifksQAWexDS5xxeo+ksFlUX9DuWDQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyOz2ii0eDsGMuB4ZZCrFdC3RtOhk0+gCrHEPQ+i4htWABvluIkSVOw9aWo1/+u7R5BCAZsyISz0AhRqntD+a8=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:cf52:: with SMTP id c18mr264566ilr.226.1638291595126; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:59:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAFsWK23GGfe+uSyPqa2wxFgRn3mk7G9ajtjfz6cKw-FaoFM_A@mail.gmail.com> <20211126042946.6F86F3091B76@ary.local> <01S6OJDEJX3O005PTU@mauve.mrochek.com> <CAAFsWK27b=SBnUfdpTUq7n6p9nZ9E=ddkB+krEa_wYbZWFcksw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwY+wrg4E1h6xifQvmwYcEk0zGXAVk28CenpEhVtDcAk3A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwY+wrg4E1h6xifQvmwYcEk0zGXAVk28CenpEhVtDcAk3A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:59:43 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAFsWK22Cdj7O8jjibpK8PkvAbUDanizBkTzMxSSwps1JRwm_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000914a4705d2047c6f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/xzuIgD0lVdRFU_S3-kmK5ahGOo8>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reversing modifications from mailing lists
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 17:00:03 -0000

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:29 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 3:31 PM Wei Chuang <weihaw=
> 40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> This approach and benefit was what I was thinking could be feasible as
>> well.  The cited draft-kucherawy-dkim-list-canon
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-kucherawy-dkim-list-canon> draft notes
>> your contribution to the concept described there i.e. to perform hashing as
>> a mime-tree (though that draft doesn't do content transport decoding).
>>
>
> It does, in Section 3.
>
> -MSK
>

Got it.  Sorry I missed that.

-Wei