Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Fri, 12 July 2019 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA1A12082E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 11:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=KHpC18ug; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=OGH+O2Cu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GCUTPqBMZZ5u for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 11:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5129A120820 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 11:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F33AF8071F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:28:40 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1562956120; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=WpjQmmWUEuGJ8mA7vdYjvNCt6cjwKPYTP/l6fKT75OU=; b=KHpC18ugSOFQhKQP5KGzpm1SvHbY+B3xBL2asDnQhivRbfASvFK3U/2I dhM+XeUjbLES7GH5oz3ckXFNaf7wAg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1562956120; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=WpjQmmWUEuGJ8mA7vdYjvNCt6cjwKPYTP/l6fKT75OU=; b=OGH+O2CuXQRNNK0YQ7m2A+z4rrLnXtsBp+gfkKzywcvhnyhHULP10Tm3 7/fYyqsaS52QvFhmPo7RZEMRlVQbqNtyUrmDxJm18twkSyKPzwyalSoqJ/ /MLOI9sES7FHbwanpIzFoYZ4SoXJjDyvEsdN1YQ3o35zgaTmVOruSzCVac tMoXznpT6fbLGZ9fgATk+iAo4x0Kb8a4eOBciLDcE5SGlw++YXGgtwFvGP vH0lQp6ogR3ahP3HQWwHuI42JedLtOjx7a9SrHHJhFjno57bgCbh1tZhxE CTnXk1vcOi+nTZIZoDcM/UuExzdOXMfp8v6OU7NquK1phZRVCwF6UA==
Received: from l5580.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32750F80607 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:28:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:28:39 -0400
Message-ID: <1958020.28HeBAo97T@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <CABuGu1rCF1C1rK9PpbEiDmP+85FvgB_aSuvieGL=hRcrFGXNBg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwbbz_UhBLsURg=eXhRBC2g9OghiN==T9Uq9pFuLtd=b7w@mail.gmail.com> <1893230.9INSBCnb99@l5580> <CABuGu1rCF1C1rK9PpbEiDmP+85FvgB_aSuvieGL=hRcrFGXNBg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/NXUEl4miT-YK7IA3I2UjJw2y94Q>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:28:43 -0000

On Friday, July 12, 2019 1:54:57 PM EDT Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:50 AM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>;
> 
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:21:14 PM EDT Seth Blank wrote:
> > > 3. If an np= tag is needed to allow PSD functioning for only NXDOMAINs
> > 
> > The limited feedback during WGLC has been favorable to this.
> > 
> > This will require a rather larger change to the document than the other
> > issues, but they are manageable and I believe I have most of the relevant
> > text
> > from earlier revisions.
> > 
> > I think we should include this.
> 
> I am much more concerned with adding another tag that can only be used in a
> PSD-DMARC record. I would be much more open to make a "normative" change to
> the DMARC tag list (RFC 7489 section 11.4) to define np for any DMARC
> record, than to make this a special case for PSD-DMARC records.

I agree.  My intent is to add the tag to be used experimentally for any DMARC 
record.  Part of the experiment is to see if it's useful beyond PSD.

Scott K