Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Fri, 12 July 2019 17:22 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA417120370 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=4Zd7hxHC; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=hljBE56g
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y-qIUSERljgT for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50F231202F0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26D1DF80607 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:22:22 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1562952142; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=sq+UCXGPGW+GYY9AhWaWSADGZOoLPXjKTWsFH74O4SM=; b=4Zd7hxHCGhysDleNfSomPBNmfA0l/g957CigmNCdkn7Dw+fcP0+Pxhpf uOSwvdJsmsMGHrG6q4Z7YHZeIFjKBA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1562952142; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=sq+UCXGPGW+GYY9AhWaWSADGZOoLPXjKTWsFH74O4SM=; b=hljBE56gVc74VDahrHTJOM9tH1KhuGQuMuoHKUMaec7kavosLIBVDHgF 4atw4WDU10Dd72ZSbNv2e5Hm7hMZtib9r36MzMqORsplgEn3ahbbGGbc/6 Q1h4Hgx+GNHsMVrJCt6lU3duc60erA3sqTNd2K/9Ds4t/Ef8m4PofMEgz5 Gt2swh9+rW5ngA+NQ8LwYs6DAzEY/cYgosJVkdFz7H6JZxpfT5ygggh8+T 4pBf1AceXAlb+3Vs48pxc5ILHO70yFsk9VtYFZEZXw9TCTVlcnWYAHIkiq ZXVmfpb4XlXpJwuYGXHVkfgRatPmDq1vUBNV/Emt3VX6jCjqqUnxnw==
Received: from l5580.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DDC21F80208 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:22:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:22:21 -0400
Message-ID: <1801771.HRRXnOL2G4@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <CAOZAAfN0+nxpN1P_nk3y5f8MTQ=c7DYNvYic2iDMuCK_bNa=qg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwbbz_UhBLsURg=eXhRBC2g9OghiN==T9Uq9pFuLtd=b7w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOZAAfN0+nxpN1P_nk3y5f8MTQ=c7DYNvYic2iDMuCK_bNa=qg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ZwmFOzRq7kEtaCQBDIQojtrAZf4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 17:22:26 -0000

On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:21:14 PM EDT Seth Blank wrote:
> As Secretary, there are three items that have not yet reached consensus
> that must be resolved during WGLC:
> 
> 1. What further context is needed in the introduction
> 2. If explicit call outs to ICANN/limited operator capacity to implement
> are needed
> 3. If an np= tag is needed to allow PSD functioning for only NXDOMAINs

It's been a pretty quiet last call.  I think the document itself is probably 
in pretty good shape with these questions as outliers.  Shortly I plan to send 
a separate email on each of these with my perspective on both the issue and my 
read of the discussion so far so we can focus on driving each question to 
closure.

Scott K