IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-Seal is meaningless security theatre

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Sun, 13 August 2017 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36340131F21 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 07:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GjXXpXB7xXbk for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 07:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F3FB132424 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 07:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id i66so25698316wmg.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 07:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=W49vO47g5N9EY0Q5k7vdn3CZTkR9T/uXVvDEuGeeCzo=; b=Jf7/a0oYFdt5NJflEixU+f2TfZf5mLARLTv8wmj6SrvHUYby0eMEV2vuxEJb19pYjG uWuQXKwZCzgXW96uppN9fKlHoe0REfqcJFwa+eNRQnGV5/G62j9S1EcK7MCyJkVO/crL 3gjqErM238IOPMaNYiS7hLNMkBOvJ3om7GVOg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=W49vO47g5N9EY0Q5k7vdn3CZTkR9T/uXVvDEuGeeCzo=; b=FFzsx/JWvid0yb1g4cpMLbyPPwl8kHPAPbnRfoZDrwKz8hRrwgYfNIOHQup5nA++wA oh/Vy+9V10WwCrXrdhrc3+6UY2Tqy+QK8hcE7nQcgPO9edgE0DjQzO1lnKDEUKuAG97c 5hHUVkeyy4h4w3R5IMOvPAyNZhXE05+u9ENNhtNmDoGBQ7lWD/yvsAO5bTp7KleAnNE3 b4fPaPSBjoNuyzHWtj2+WLKP54wC0KtLeMlUHhhNMRv1MLrRelyQrjPfqDCMlVXgXH1v YIy0YFH2lwFVi+Z/QzQCOIMqC778WRtcuMWMHC2wCMpFIdpdtJge4CuYmJ+6foLOHKYf UwFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5j4lxHCuwRpYUIEe2mn197mpO0Y2e0qyRn1681qcyjhRsrjc9Jc LwZKoUiGUCSxnGoGgme87C9KGF0RfY8N9ik=
X-Received: by 10.80.217.4 with SMTP id t4mr20713198edj.225.1502634482537; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 07:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: kurta@drkurt.com
Received: by 10.80.178.229 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Aug 2017 07:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <598F9484.7020700@isdg.net>
References: <1502083287.2191248.1065195288.7CDC7FF3@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CABuGu1oTMbuLd4yTwecu5sKFnsmH+HiwT1FG=JpySYHzpMTx_w@mail.gmail.com> <1502200759.3946686.1066841264.607B4D0B@webmail.messagingengine.com> <2720431.u3G7bbkkxK@kitterma-e6430> <1502317564.1935379.1068588344.040173AF@webmail.messagingengine.com> <a08c7590-ded3-1642-4ffc-07848b3c6cd2@gmail.com> <e14f2130-6f00-4ef1-485b-850a4cc1c48c@gmail.com> <1502495646.4099176.1070896040.2B09B1F8@webmail.messagingengine.com> <166070f0-4ba1-70da-1f73-885b4a7f7640@gmail.com> <1502497178.4103451.1070917304.23DD466D@webmail.messagingengine.com> <598F9484.7020700@isdg.net>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 07:28:01 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6kbo99iMaTH-ucDdk614Gy-DNNw
Message-ID: <CABuGu1p=oLfLRkuoaDHoz3Cv3_FrURdsFPzkac7jNzBpqBmiSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net>
Cc: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>, "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e082235d88f2b380556a35a7e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ig9MuMjJXYdF3epSZuU88QHH9dI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-Seal is meaningless security theatre
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 14:28:06 -0000

On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> wrote:

>   If we even have a DMARC ARC Policy concept, than that may be enough to
> begin pursuing the high cost of experimentation and development here.
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>
>

Beyond the protocol and usage specs, what are you looking for?

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email