Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC-Seal is meaningless security theatre

[Hector Santos <[e-mail]>]

On 8/11/2017 1:19 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 8/11/2017 9:34 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
>> I think that we have that sort of information scattered around in
>> various non-spec presentations that have happened regarding ARC. Do
>> you consider this to be something that should be tackled before or
>> after the "intent"-related notes in your earlier review notes from
>> the end of July?
>
>
> I think it's compatible with some of the concerns I raise and so
> should be pursued at the same time.  I'm hoping that the exercise will
> produce much better clarity and coherence and widespread understanding
> of what ARC will and will not do.
>

This is important if there is going to be an wider implementation here 
especially among the community of non-open source developers.  This is 
where the expense will be and there is an  expectation of having a 
document can developers can produce code from.

-- 
HLS