Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #54 (Limits on recipients per report) - With Interim Notes
Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> Fri, 28 May 2021 18:33 UTC
Return-Path: <dotzero@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8BA3A3150 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D-7gN1ptUW7P for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x831.google.com (mail-qt1-x831.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::831]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34AA23A314E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x831.google.com with SMTP id c15so3374511qte.6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RKQndcakdnS96/Xzyrnv7vIl61JLPLPghF9LmEt4gQE=; b=jN7UMRC5FDOIhAsjPRS62OjWpV0ZJJBZahoYVQaDjysSFEpmul3I5iGDLOcCuKN1kl GNfujt0+GExJDNmnllbJrAVDM6NiBkEwh0h1/c+Q38wcyqkcwqNe9/ZPIzLZTGznT5fH tqb+WEE1sgO4wi8WblZ+E1D8HDuIJ+jD6jzP9dsO9dlDmbCQcQVB55ReanRSpugly/le 2amgiGlRXSO12cK2vpbjLmUaUgExAzOdwftz08hQnDIb+ZfH/Qdn8J00SK5NwvB9Okiy JUTtAbFekPg5WIXIKLe4qr6efFniEl1bqZTnX/GBQavYXieTCCsSOe3FoTAUKPyfkhZ7 YQGQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=RKQndcakdnS96/Xzyrnv7vIl61JLPLPghF9LmEt4gQE=; b=iVNn10QngwxSccCGqZ1rk3txalgkr75M6JvOMpas4MacaUCwPJMoLNmcjhPNU9YVY9 fdTLvfsY+24yUczMrMbTMcMFUlXgNCBQsPErQGyGFZb00j1e9SeQsvuqtb6bbGMQQkPv LvDlEJb0LfmfKVDk2di0uryukLmGJScdp1lAuwJV8yL0kfpLDJ/2VEBlUe++rAtAoxl9 EpB8fDN6vbSW+ySpkGwzRZ/e7AbGcV7iS9zUNP3L9U1PSaH5eCHJnk8dFjAg/lPzpg8R JwlsmCMi1OCCAn/0pOY04+Wd3DBO6GLW9VJ0FcR5zp3QaqhU1qaEQlnHl42iw+UIH72e UDHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533vvhkbRmn81GaunDIjMiFTJqHn20edSWg5vngq2p+wBjCBaOYQ 3CL002PwhBFLsy41CL34KBNcob5+D08Ur8EgW2ZdvW2AsFVxLQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGqA96NmLm2OWrjn2eHyE7/tqp7otdQocjQ5Pdl8ZGHsMSlhi8A5wVpcCwv4ub4nc7A8YKGwe0eKqbKI5tTMk=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7a84:: with SMTP id x4mr4697833qtr.267.1622226798227; Fri, 28 May 2021 11:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <848f1692-eb17-b055-610b-05419ec9e5cf@tana.it> <20210528180337.0B9D78E038B@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <20210528180337.0B9D78E038B@ary.qy>
From: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 14:33:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJ4XoYemUDs7VF8QBd+K97fdjoN0N1Sqz=S6f4SYKz94taNMMA@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000db24c05c3681c4a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/zwuZwsNHURcCxTtMEPaa74pdNn4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #54 (Limits on recipients per report) - With Interim Notes
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 18:33:26 -0000
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 2:03 PM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: > It appears that Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> said: > >On Fri 28/May/2021 17:46:54 +0200 Todd Herr wrote: > >> Greetings. > >> > >> Consensus on Ticket #54 <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/54> > (Remove or > >> expand limits on number of recipients per report) was reached during > the May 27 > >> DMARC Interim to update the text in the DMARC URIs section to read: > >> > >> The place such URIs are specified (see Section 6.3) > >> allows a list of these to be provided. The list of URIs is > separated by > >> commas (ASCII 0x2c). A report SHOULD be sent to each listed URI > provided in > >> the DMARC record. > > > > > >Works for me. (Note that a limit of 100 recipients is silently enforced > by > >most underlying MTAs.) > > That's 100 recipients per SMTP session. Nothing keeps you from sending > mail to 10,000 > recipients in 100 sessions. I do not think this detail affects the > decision to take > out the limit since it's hard to imagine a useful scenario with as many as > 10 recipients. > > -- > Regards, > John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for > Dummies", > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly > +1 Michael Hammer
- [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #54 (Limit… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #54 (L… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #54 (L… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #54 (L… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #54 (L… Steven M Jones
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #54 (L… Todd Herr