Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

[Shunsuke Homma <[e-mail]>]

Hi Dave,

Thank you for reviewing our draft and sending your thought for the adoption.

When I reviewed the charter I couldn't find any text to make the draft 
to be out of scope. Could you please elaborate it with the text in the 
charter?

Best regards,

Shunsuke


On 2018/11/15 6:52, David Allan I wrote:
> HI
> 
> AFAIK 3GPP CT4 is looking for work it can adopt, and has indicated that 
> it wishes to perform the analysis itself. When they were directed to 
> this document in the recent IETF DMM liaison, it  resulted in a liaison 
> reply clearly indicated they would define their own criteria.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1590/
> 
> However in the draft it states in the introduction: “However we believe 
> that to provide adequate information for 3GPP, we need to clearly 
> understand what the current user plane protocol is in Release 15, and 
> architectural requirements for the user plane.” And in the conclusion 
> “Our conclusion here is that we suggest the UP protocol study work in 
> 3GPP takes into account the evaluation aspects described in Section 5.”, 
> there is more, but I do not feel a need to be pedantic about it.
> 
> So the purpose of this draft seems to explicitly be to do work for 3GPP 
> that they have explicitly said they DO NOT WANT.
> 
> At the same time I do not see anything in the charter that suggests we 
> should be doing this work either.  It would appear to have little to do 
> with DMM’s chartered direction.
> 
> As such I am opposed to adoption of the draft.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
> 


-- 
----------------------------------
Shunsuke Homma
<[e-mail]>
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

NTT Network Service Systems Labs.
Musashino city, Tokyo, Japan
----------------------------------