IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Wed, 21 November 2018 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E77131004 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:17:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.151
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OPsNyqBocCfk for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:16:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3D6C130DFB for <dmm@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:16:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id l9so6073274wrt.13 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:16:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=0s1qC6ISHjzk3jox6EoAT9DAe3Og/+SG0kaAlpOZrpo=; b=T9fsemwkldXouyQf8b0uewApfsRjmK6ZioR+QTqp5oL/xoDArOyAK5PVCoambRNKMl wXm7fpXwzOhnq1KZKxu1Nz8AIGj1TEBDYsGeQhxwXcFd6InM53l6EHRUeHL3X/TgtQ2Y 3b5uFCpueHLZOln2ZDdHaNxmsb4+6H3xuO/1GTSEG3aPplMaA/cLH/ial6kqYLw7xY0K RkRkhmdmD1yTjwlPtVtPDMPrjXEYlgl2ZOIRFwn5Nj2rtUVZ61W8bKOsFDYNd3lpDGNy dHkAaKRvpf6kqZkm4WBrjtphtWTUO+drnGH3QNMwGNngMnIispwcuWAzyu2O4q5b3AXM XkNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0s1qC6ISHjzk3jox6EoAT9DAe3Og/+SG0kaAlpOZrpo=; b=OF5JoJw7L/Qo1lsaiFn4dxjGWdyGKsgI6YtK8Vi4bmL4zEJk6KS09/TmlC0bLENa+x F6JA7eHTxrRJj3vXOHuBLE1e4rk7dAoVLMpn4VuTzIHmkRAkImn2KSlUsMeEPnxfpmcR UeOTjOP3i+CF/ZDrITUs5rG2PDDxH3VUgCA+Jl4TcfP9cYhXmvRMe6nXleeuEcAc9ELf /S63U6s9XR44riTpcLgyUHxrMEDRBmK1/K/lW06sdBiqOBnGphdBpMhghhaJP++R++Sy YR0sus9gryeWEcLlYujLvl9TQtoC7+VynRDOlos05ObeRzXvAIKITDmJ2rMq1G1RquAA CNbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWY/J02fDIuq9/hoMCpveLV1dAlfybN35hMJuDtP/0+GDhUxkRne r/ULYWVIJrkp57WCnvashrDaGQgnwLeZkPWYtJM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XDTuaWhZJYs1mFtCl/I+YsaTVqBKIbdWN6pe7QEVb5jH2nQn2xjwY76aMG7IZMVG4Pu2ioyv33j603gViuYKg=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:dec4:: with SMTP id i4mr5998137wrn.307.1542813412212; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:16:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CO1PR15MB109589470678B3C515CC60D7D0C30@CO1PR15MB1095.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR15MB109589470678B3C515CC60D7D0C30@CO1PR15MB1095.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:16:41 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcf5AuVRJ3UgddLHOyXNnFU0CBFiqMOWHKEAc4tZn0mX0A@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com>
Cc: dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000063c3c9057b2e3d0c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/HQoJOvJjSWOH4wOjaa1TxQpTj3U>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:17:02 -0000

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 3:53 PM David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com>
wrote:

> HI
>
>
>
> AFAIK 3GPP CT4 is looking for work it can adopt, and has indicated that it
> wishes to perform the analysis itself. When they were directed to this
> document in the recent IETF DMM liaison, it  resulted in a liaison reply
> clearly indicated they would define their own criteria.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1590/
>
>
>
> However in the draft it states in the introduction: “However we believe
> that to provide adequate information for 3GPP, we need to clearly
> understand what the current user plane protocol is in Release 15, and
> architectural requirements for the user plane.” And in the conclusion “Our
> conclusion here is that we suggest the UP protocol study work in 3GPP takes
> into account the evaluation aspects described in Section 5.”, there is
> more, but I do not feel a need to be pedantic about it.
>
>
>
> So the purpose of this draft seems to explicitly be to do work for 3GPP
> that they have explicitly said they DO NOT WANT.
>
>
>
> At the same time I do not see anything in the charter that suggests we
> should be doing this work either.  It would appear to have little to do
> with DMM’s chartered direction.
>
>
>
> As such I am opposed to adoption of the draft.
>
>
>

+1

I had raised similar issues before.

BTW no offense to Shunsuke.

and no offense to my friend Sri :-)

Behcet

> Cheers
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email