Re: [dns-privacy] Early port allocation request for dns-over-TLS

Quick question: What document is "the document"?

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The chairs believe that there is sufficient interest in the working
> group for early allocation of a port for dns over TLS, following RFC
> 7120.
>
> Looking at the eligibility criteria in RFC 7120 Section 2:
> 2a) we expect this port to be a system port and therefore the IANA
> policy for it is IETF Review.
> 2b) we believe the document has adequately described the protocol.
> 2c) we believe the document has reached a good level of stability.
> 2d) The Working Group chairs and Area Directors (ADs) judge that there is
> sufficient interest in the community for early (pre-RFC) implementation
> and deployment, or that failure to make an early allocation might lead to
> contention for the code point in the field.
>
>
> If you violently disagree with this plan, please let us know no later
> than Friday the 14th.
>
> W
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>    ---maf
>
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> dns-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
>

-- 
Colm