IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] Early port allocation request for dns-over-TLS

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 13 August 2015 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560EB1B2D59 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a-SsrCgEkkom for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 669B81A03D5 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3msbcC5NNLz3R6; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 20:13:15 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: mx.nohats.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca header.i=@nohats.ca header.b=Xm1jxlgb
X-OPENPGPKEY: Message passed unmodified
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dCXyQVADswem; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 20:13:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 20:13:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DF8800A0; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:13:14 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1439489594; bh=+Xb8GA5bmIbg2pFBXo2odVIJxk9A5DrS7i6GrV5yhcI=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Xm1jxlgbVWeWBHAtgtOduC/CBALMLSQGYTE9moEegiE6defzTddzm7agFL/E6f/pQ SOlTCxpMBcUsGfq1rzWLSoFdrFGXDfsztkuCzYCAuKQh84eBDvzBYz0mebzwXD31OK IkGtUd3ut2joKFfT7WATuEGtyOm5WfVKK74Q1IVY=
Received: from localhost (paul@localhost) by bofh.nohats.ca (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id t7DIDDoM016448; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:13:13 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: bofh.nohats.ca: paul owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:13:13 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <55CCDCA3.6080203@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1508131412230.16179@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CAHw9_iJ8QPyHqg2emJm4RfSnsiUcHFY7tGS3K9nL5HJYTyww_Q@mail.gmail.com> <55CA382A.9020707@isi.edu> <55CCDCA3.6080203@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/ZMik6an7939CWbqzmkL8gQe3HDU>
Cc: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Early port allocation request for dns-over-TLS
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 18:13:19 -0000

On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Joe Touch wrote:

> Joe Abley reminded me off-list that the service name for DNS is
> "domain", so my suggestion for the name for this new assignment would
> then be "domain-s".

Why? Just let the "domain" reference die please, don't build on it.

dnstls or so seems fine to me :P


Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email