Re: [dns-privacy] Early port allocation request for dns-over-TLS

[Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>]

On Friday, August 7, 2015, Warren Kumari <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The chairs believe that there is sufficient interest in the working
> group for early allocation of a port for dns over TLS, following RFC
> 7120.


... and a quick clarification - we will be asking for both TCP and UDP.

W


>
> Looking at the eligibility criteria in RFC 7120 Section 2:
> 2a) we expect this port to be a system port and therefore the IANA
> policy for it is IETF Review.
> 2b) we believe the document has adequately described the protocol.
> 2c) we believe the document has reached a good level of stability.
> 2d) The Working Group chairs and Area Directors (ADs) judge that there is
> sufficient interest in the community for early (pre-RFC) implementation
> and deployment, or that failure to make an early allocation might lead to
> contention for the code point in the field.
>
>
> If you violently disagree with this plan, please let us know no later
> than Friday the 14th.
>
> W
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>    ---maf
>


-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf