IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] Alternative signalling propsals

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Fri, 14 December 2018 23:13 UTC

Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B28C131342 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:13:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.89
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id thiFyJPdku9f for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:13:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [IPv6:2001:470:1:116::7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3B8C131353 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:13:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (unknown [38.109.115.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A866F99F; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 18:13:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 047D92043F; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:54:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org, jreed@akamai.com
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1812141741410.12056@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <74C380A3-C69F-4340-A723-B134F052953E@akamai.com> <CAHw9_iKcYoW2U=fLM=HqGY0=JHAd13Dc5pbue53d64SgE3bUwg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1812141741410.12056@bofh.nohats.ca>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:54:05 -0500
Message-ID: <874lbf3ek2.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/BtgGXwC-jlrBiAgA-BXY2K39gTw>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Alternative signalling propsals
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 23:13:31 -0000

On Fri 2018-12-14 17:43:44 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> We fixed that with tls-dnssec-chain :P
>
> I'll leave it up to others to wonder why and how this did not move
> forward, and is now going via ISE.
>
> Sorry for the side-track of this discussion.

This isn't sidetrack at all, it was one of the motivating use cases of
tls-dnssec-chain-extension from my perspective, and particularly sad to
see it fail as a result. :(

    --dkg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email