IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] AD review of draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing-09

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 22 July 2023 23:11 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD98C151AFB for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4H3PUsAqD6Ar for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 257ACC15153F for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5217bb5ae05so4114769a12.0 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1690067479; x=1690672279; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nj6xV0SJjlkdL9Z8GDrNWc7/+OnLNohlXsIaN4cgZe8=; b=cdzVYrIgDEZBVyJPdQCyec6ZQwUthpeai8Mt7ZjQ6uOVPcgsrK7bo+fvDSK7NjCvnp i8wqyJpZlGyJ0+DqpKyPMdA7ZsVuhk/1TOIvfBE/emTsjKpHUKfHnr4b9D6q5pB34K6v Szcj/JjneYGtshOb7TP6eoLJ7alsVFsA78IGTT3pxm06BX+B4p23O0QwTK4YFrveCIo+ hEM0hoXTkNbCvJn03d3qpTLS/cM7dJHn5LJd5Ok/M9HdrJSizI4zpBp+hbfrtb1zgQlz 7A4LlSOdFESJcsfhB6OFKueGxMfxfEqeWxr5U03uJQMTVqHhoGurTei5vj1OupX+/f7V L5DA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1690067479; x=1690672279; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=nj6xV0SJjlkdL9Z8GDrNWc7/+OnLNohlXsIaN4cgZe8=; b=aEyeCUAkAW3r8+1wzJSI+SDUNpbeSG4iD1Sw54nc8j9hKbOEa/hRcM636Tfw1k6lBP 4SoGYsJWoZptykcSPVxxva4oinlK4NAHwW9Qgi7OMON3v24rJSMh//AE0l2P5igAknqF XUC2KRFiuCpTFZRSJZz9xqhhA8+HU8ITqZXJzBBFOA7NiqqQkEbz7pwkXTfyFBS2j2CX nSTx8IH/6+RaLPEX2KaK25A+YZXXjF9SldtkyEQR6v4/Ee2LyglU2hBmJwUqP6bOinH1 P9jqUazylFQJ+1WKZfCk6FSGvbDFv1C3TdEy7ZYdBqlEx2ikeiC5yrXOGbA1n7ZPCOqm YBoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLYGSKZfH1u17Y8//WiSpEiH9ShGkANkJ+5Ruag+IlrHvAW9zMhw 2Ffd0c7nYsj3BX01E7RYAHg8vXcLD1W1zpt7DYo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlGJUHU0SG1Pae8meUanN+Z/OMQHBL6B745pzMR5DnmH+zSmSMhH9t80+Fu4nByUMV+EnjIcStj6ARz+S4tHNgo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:12da:b0:51e:ef8:9368 with SMTP id k26-20020a05640212da00b0051e0ef89368mr5000900edx.37.1690067479340; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <C0F3EA5F-96EF-4777-94E3-3B3913134483@cisco.com> <BCD1E369-59E3-4A20-960A-A7052DEA3DC7@icann.org> <faf9ea55-e46b-d80a-bcb1-675898acbb15@huitema.net>
In-Reply-To: <faf9ea55-e46b-d80a-bcb1-675898acbb15@huitema.net>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:11:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SwNoyvx9Z3Ts3Juo2H0cEUvOPArBkT-tmcroQEc1gmg4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c0aa5e06011b7ffb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/UOtneDNv9f3HKOKg6DZnDb9e5nU>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] AD review of draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing-09
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Addition of privacy to the DNS protocol <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 23:11:22 -0000

On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 3:27 PM Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
wrote:

>
> IF we were serious about the "informational only" status, then we would
>  [...]
>

Disagree. Non-standards track RFCs can have these requirements. For
example, they may be documents never intended for the standards track (in
that they never intend to give the IETF change control), or rejected
alternatives.

This document does exactly what is called for by RFC 7322:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7322#section-4.8.2

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email