IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Fri, 26 April 2013 07:14 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0E621F97A6 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GzX+hZCVeNu1 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5439721F979F for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (shaun.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::42]) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CEBCBC41F; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:14:04 +0100 (BST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130426063000.0A9A13303183@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:14:02 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <68361517-94CF-4A91-9251-573167CA6C58@rfc1035.com>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1304251758160.66546@joyce.lan> <20130426004632.B5E1E32FAF70@drugs.dv.isc.org> <9A4E511F-92E1-4286-AD91-4E438C821774@rfc1035.com> <20130426063000.0A9A13303183@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 07:14:05 -0000

On 26 Apr 2013, at 07:29, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:

> The type code is allocated.  Code supporting EUI48 and EUI64 has
> shipped.  BIND 9.6, 9.8 and 9.9 all support EUI48 and EUI64. The
> rest is bikeshedding.

Indeed. My point is/was that the bikeshedding and other showboating in this WG create the perception that getting type codes is hard.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email