Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs
Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Fri, 26 April 2013 04:11 UTC
Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2641521E803F for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y348hgfd+uoe for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:500:60::65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6C721F96A3 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEAF95F9863; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 04:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isc.org; s=dkim2012; t=1366949509; bh=Pw/Td3rpOINsJB4942+NEEhBM0rxRih7E1whr11S7S0=; h=To:Cc:From:References:Subject:In-reply-to:Date; b=BwVE9nDEp9rz2S+3OhHxsJ5lyda5b4D58jtPMVF/Syx7H11IGHMr158pNN609zngK frr5MOnKcM/v76ftRvGfCACKt86czZ4PrxtuJCQtU86h/l7AHTPjW2nQWG8xHeWVcV PEuhbg+R7DdjGRXSeYtAy8OpazIRMvR24ZyDYdQE=
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:820:4129:b64c:428a:9207]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06A0C216C40; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 04:11:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D7C32FE54F; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:11:32 +1000 (EST)
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20130426034321.68173.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-reply-to: Your message of "26 Apr 2013 03:43:21 +0000." <20130426034321.68173.qmail@joyce.lan>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:11:32 +1000
Message-Id: <20130426041132.D7D7C32FE54F@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 04:11:51 -0000
In message <20130426034321.68173.qmail@joyce.lan>, "John Levine" writes: > >> 1. Insert the ability into the interface to add freeform stuff > >> 2. Run the equivalent of named-checkzone prior to committing the change > >> 3. Profit! > > I don't know whether to laugh or cry. > > No, this won't work with provisioning systems in the real world, that > have to be usable by people who are not DNS weenies, and work in > systems where the software upgrade cycle is months or years, not days. > > There are real reasons that seven years after RFC 4408, most > provisioning systems still don't handle type 99 records, and it's not > because everyone who does e-mail is stupid. It just money. Really that is the only reason at this point. They won't spend a cent to make their systems updatable or they want to charge extra for supporting type 99 records. > No need to respond, you've made your point, although it may not be > what you thought it was. One can upgrade components of a system. Nameservers are regularly upgraded independently on the rest of the system. Similarly other tools are regularly upgraded. > R's, > John > _______________________________________________ > dnsext mailing list > dnsext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs John R Levine
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs John R Levine
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs John Levine
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs Douglas Otis
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs joel jaeggli
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs Ted Lemon
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs Måns Nilsson
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs Warren Kumari
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs John Levine
- Re: [dnsext] getting people to use new RRTYPEs Douglas Otis