IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6840 (4191)

Samuel Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com> Tue, 02 December 2014 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <weiler@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3061A1A78 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:12:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xBmJjzfMAYg0 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:12:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 253B61A8748 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:11:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A1328B0017; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 16:11:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (nova.tislabs.com [10.66.1.77]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A661F8036; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 16:11:57 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 16:11:57 -0500
From: Samuel Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20141202163646.E4BFC18123F@rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.03.1412021603110.25480@tislabs.com>
References: <20141202163646.E4BFC18123F@rfc-editor.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/QjTELeq7SywTMLT4nF-vIJA0jTg
Cc: edward.lewis@icann.org, brian@innovationslab.net, dnsext@ietf.org, ted.lemon@nominum.com, ogud@ogud.com
Subject: Re: [dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6840 (4191)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 21:12:22 -0000

The errata is correct, but I agree with Donald - the old text is adequate 
and unlikely to lead to confusion.  (Well ... plenty of people are 
confused about this particular piece of the spec, but this clarification 
is unlikely to change that.  I am probably also biased, as the writer of 
that old text.)

I have no objection to marking this as verified, but I do not see it as 
necessary.

-- Sam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email