IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6840 (4191)

Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org> Wed, 03 December 2014 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <tale@dd.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D05A1A1B5D for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 07:15:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qZf-gQvzOzyu for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 07:15:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gro.dd.org (gro.dd.org [207.136.192.136]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 973551A1AD0 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 07:15:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gro.dd.org (Postfix, from userid 102) id DF2893F432; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:15:52 -0500 (EST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <21631.10536.718334.94547@gro.dd.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:15:52 -0500
From: Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org>
To: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <201412030932.sB39WljG056257@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
References: <20141202163646.E4BFC18123F@rfc-editor.org> <alpine.LRH.2.03.1412021603110.25480@tislabs.com> <CAHw9_iKdrKJNOuU=FgwbD0xy8oa5vkGY4d4+G=syz4gEh0My=A@mail.gmail.com> <201412030932.sB39WljG056257@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/Vv3TN5kidYc1iutr_fnp7PDw-90
Cc: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, dnsext@ietf.org, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>, Ólafur Guðmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6840 (4191)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 15:15:56 -0000

Jaap Akkerhuis writes:
> The DNS RFC are already plagued with a lot of fuzzy wordings leading
> to confusion by non DNS experts.  Therefore it will be good to be
> have this errata.

I agree with Jaap.  This is such a minor step to take to increase the
precision of the wording, with seemingly no disagreement that the new
wording is deficient.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email