IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6840 (4191)

"Blacka, David" <davidb@verisign.com> Tue, 02 December 2014 21:54 UTC

Return-Path: <davidb@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643931A6EFB for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:54:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pplzIg5Ccqb5 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:54:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod6og125.obsmtp.com (exprod6og125.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E91161A6F40 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:54:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from brn1lxmailout02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([72.13.63.42]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob125.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKVH40+bkmnYSgxo2fDD+un0XuDBlQuJrK@postini.com; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:54:30 PST
Received: from BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexchm01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.255]) by brn1lxmailout02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sB2LrvD5004238 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 2 Dec 2014 16:53:58 -0500
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 16:53:57 -0500
From: "Blacka, David" <davidb@verisign.com>
To: Samuel Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com>
Thread-Topic: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6840 (4191)
Thread-Index: AQHQDk49UbVMgzMS2U2hfUiRBw9k5px9IGqA//+36jE=
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 21:53:56 +0000
Message-ID: <03E542B6-38B0-40F6-A928-5FF89999B038@verisign.com>
References: <20141202163646.E4BFC18123F@rfc-editor.org>, <alpine.LRH.2.03.1412021603110.25480@tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.03.1412021603110.25480@tislabs.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/wu9XZjesYs-B2TR-54-XUhhEWHk
Cc: "edward.lewis@icann.org" <edward.lewis@icann.org>, "brian@innovationslab.net" <brian@innovationslab.net>, "dnsext@ietf.org" <dnsext@ietf.org>, "ted.lemon@nominum.com" <ted.lemon@nominum.com>, "ogud@ogud.com" <ogud@ogud.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6840 (4191)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 21:54:32 -0000

Agreed. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 2, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Samuel Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com> wrote:
> 
> The errata is correct, but I agree with Donald - the old text is adequate and unlikely to lead to confusion.  (Well ... plenty of people are confused about this particular piece of the spec, but this clarification is unlikely to change that.  I am probably also biased, as the writer of that old text.)
> 
> I have no objection to marking this as verified, but I do not see it as necessary.
> 
> -- Sam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email