Re: [DNSOP] call for adoption: draft-vandergaast-dnsop-edns-client-subnet

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear DNSOP WG,
>
> This draft documents the specification, use, and cautions regarding the "client-subnet" EDNS option. Please consider adoption of this draft as a WG work item.
>
> As some of you will remember, this is a successor to a draft that was considered in DNSEXT some time ago and eventually expired without formal action. Since then, the option codepoint has been granted under the appropriate registry policy (expert review) and the option is in significant operational use.
>
> The topic has come up more than once on the WG mailing list, with some vigorous discussion, so a couple of the original authors and a couple of new people have revived the draft in the interests of documenting the option, including specific behavior and cautions in its use.
>
> The draft is available here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vandergaast-dnsop-edns-client-subnet/

We actually have some updates that unfortunately didn't *quite* make
it in before the cutoff[0].

The updated version / version in the edit buffer is at:
https://github.com/wkumari/draft-vandergaast-edns-client-subnet
The changes are minor, so review the
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vandergaast-dnsop-edns-client-subnet/
version, but if you mention typos / etc we might say "Thanks! Already
fixed in edit buffer :-)"

W

[0]: Yes, making it in before the cut-off or not making it in before
the cut-off is a binary, but, well....

>
> Please review to see if you think this document is suitable for adoption by DNSOP and comment to the list.
>
> Please state your view, your reasons, and (if you're in favor of adoption) whether you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
>
> This call for adoption ends Tuesday 11-Nov.-2014, end of the day wherever you happen to be. This is the same day as our WG meeting at IETF 91.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Suzanne Woolf
> DNSOP co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf