Re: [DNSOP] call for adoption: draft-vandergaast-dnsop-edns-client-subnet

My dayjob supports this as well and has been running resolvers with similar
functionality implemented for a while now.   We are looking to switch to
edns-clent-subnet once it is standardized and have been approached by
parties willing to invest in development.

Peter

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Mark Delany <f4t@november.emu.st> wrote:

> On 24Dec14, Mark Delany allegedly wrote:
> > > The draft is available here:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vandergaast-dnsop-edns-client-subnet/
> >
> > a) 6.2 - Intent of SCOPE NETMASK
> >
> >   "In both cases, the value of the SCOPE NETMASK in the reply has strong
> >   implications with regard to how the reply will be cached"
> >
> > I wonder whether SCOPE NETMASK should have a bigger impact beyond how
> > the reply is cached?
>
> Tap tap tap. Is this thing turned on?
>
> I think 3-4 people made some well-considered feedback on this draft,
> but there has been zero discussion or author feedback for some six
> weeks now.
>
> Does that mean there is insufficient interest in progressing this draft?
>
> I ask because in my dayjob we've been recently approached by some
> large eyeball providers who are now willing to invest in upgrading
> their resolver infrastructure to support client-subnet now that they
> see the benefits.
>
> It'd be a pity if this died on the vine just as others are starting to
> come around to the idea.
>
>
> Mark.
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
>