Re: [DNSOP] call for adoption: draft-vandergaast-dnsop-edns-client-subnet

I support adoption because operators are using this spec.  I plan to review
and also to encourage a few others who have reviews to contribute.

On 28 October 2014 08:50, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear DNSOP WG,
>
> This draft documents the specification, use, and cautions regarding the
> "client-subnet" EDNS option. Please consider adoption of this draft as a WG
> work item.
>
> As some of you will remember, this is a successor to a draft that was
> considered in DNSEXT some time ago and eventually expired without formal
> action. Since then, the option codepoint has been granted under the
> appropriate registry policy (expert review) and the option is in
> significant operational use.
>
> The topic has come up more than once on the WG mailing list, with some
> vigorous discussion, so a couple of the original authors and a couple of
> new people have revived the draft in the interests of documenting the
> option, including specific behavior and cautions in its use.
>
> The draft is available here:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vandergaast-dnsop-edns-client-subnet/
>
> Please review to see if you think this document is suitable for adoption
> by DNSOP and comment to the list.
>
> Please state your view, your reasons, and (if you're in favor of adoption)
> whether you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
>
> This call for adoption ends Tuesday 11-Nov.-2014, end of the day wherever
> you happen to be. This is the same day as our WG meeting at IETF 91.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Suzanne Woolf
> DNSOP co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>