Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations-12; was Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations-12

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 6:06 PM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 10 Jul 2018, at 13:25, Michael StJohns wrote:
>
> >>> Finally, this purports to update RFC7538 which is Informational.
> >>
> >> That's a good point. The WG draft that led to RFC 7538 was marked as
> >> Informational for its entire lifetime, so the WG must have thought it
> >> was OK to treat key rollover timing considerations as Informational.
> >
> > *sigh*  Sorry - RFC7583 - not 7538.
>
> We both gave the wrong number, but what you say and what I say still
> stands: this WG earlier decided that an earlier document on key rollover
> timing considerations was Informational.
>

Just a quick note - the authors have no unhappiness with
Informational, and I've updated the GitHub version of the draft to
make it Informational (and also added a sentence to the Abstract which
says what this updates in RFC7583).

W

> --Paul Hoffman
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf