[DNSOP] Re: DNSOP4 documents for consideration about the future of LocalRoot behavior.

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Thu, 22 January 2026 23:41 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14511ABBD189 for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:41:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hardakers.net
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id csVjyAeGkSiw for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:41:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [107.220.113.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCEF9ABBD0E4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:40:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [203.117.154.201]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7863F206CC; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:40:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.hardakers.net 7863F206CC
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hardakers.net; s=default; t=1769125240; bh=R/n4C0QBc53NrRc8/4iVgM+KIjiKpnQGtO0sD9eGzjY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=pmDzAn6wI2Yq3rl5N+WY82ISYbxf2RRdJlcribE/PGBgsjbTyggW/fWhqrDcL/sD4 Wqm70enXO2RiJh6YnQIOSZEvwqCp1y6pHEe9xL6Gc2jGtaVlXruZx8A5GtrpQHRX3H 6dYiHjQTfD++OTYjIvSSx60GdDZL9jcJ6D2hYI8c=
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:40:39 -0800
Message-ID: <ybltswdi5c8.fsf@wx.hardakers.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-ID-Hash: 5RFAWKBVX5TNRLLIZFNIXQUTLTQ6RFUF
X-Message-ID-Hash: 5RFAWKBVX5TNRLLIZFNIXQUTLTQ6RFUF
X-MailFrom: wjhns1@hardakers.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: DNSOP4 documents for consideration about the future of LocalRoot behavior.
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/3716rLcR-F-IwMMZc7KGKqtfoEM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> writes:

> I agree: AS112 *AND* ...

I suspect we all are in violent agreement on that actually.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
Google