Re: [DNSOP] Any website publishers who use CDNs on the list?

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 07 November 2018 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8443D1294D7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 12:31:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fxBBozgH6r8k for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 12:31:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x131.google.com (mail-it1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDFE8129385 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 12:31:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x131.google.com with SMTP id e11so21467169itl.5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 12:31:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PU2jdG+1BupeOfFf2hV+Dy7NQjPe7ptyTetIYwDCv/I=; b=RnZJNqHhOp86a5x4QJqmvvnrTePmEWh4wJP/OPcIfamYEUEmx4u8lOW1VSLScqVYPO zNNVIJacDevuM2fF8lG4a5bqbsLWk79z7EWfMWjRjxJ7GZ8DEVhZTxn374xOp+zq7LYb YXZkA19ezwZYDKcAgOH0nhcJbFeQ8C1VpPTgYG5Zjyu1BTyx41HAqEHFwLO5MUFzApRA NKEHRnMNcuFW2usiaUJoMHcQK6Wun55foTlYdnR8d2kkmf0aDNOwOxXpVIspIwBeyHg3 qm/Su29Gu28Oo/2d1iCd+kyyCEJaUDLnIyiYkl9r+ygQaDhA6xKJda7SvRDgLhm66HxF 4r+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PU2jdG+1BupeOfFf2hV+Dy7NQjPe7ptyTetIYwDCv/I=; b=EM1ZB4IboimbMFBgGj7XCQJD5EW2QU4cPDyPaym6yaS7S/PxKJ2eZyKAReOUDC7pjK LSc1RtwG2VP7brTUsSsTcXqnJ7D6d3seOZstje/ysjVGXAy38mQUxtzU6/nvjawEdxqJ PbOa5LOwd6FMBozFl/wJDUuaKERPzsfIxiSNrpgC8ZiEGOovX1pPPd7CwSvZhfpHvMGo evM+VerYGeGFChM7LgjCfqexJhncArHWSe8qBT2qcgwebp2uJQwKqN/y9wHkrHkai0OC NaZAaduyrWUaGmE/BMaRzPxd/zjdY4exAjns7aeRYfkXZO2BVooRNxJBZBZWEWLa+Tre ACgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gI076GP21fTU4TNGtFWp7CmnjgEDFij3+cfd8hk2UuRARUrIT3h oKCY/h/ImUOVyQZox23Am0Yz3hu6iQ5WR/ZZQrs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5eDn6d2DJe3vrKi6S5zH3ZMoTyAlVcdNyr3GtnW4y2KTwvMJcy73wYixO85HtpTsNFtW2rZnOwlXpZ1MjmDx+Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:c6da:: with SMTP id r26-v6mr1753705jan.22.1541622702110; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 12:31:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CCEEBCEF-FE91-49A6-96FE-122A5E025159@isoc.org> <20181102121108.GE12840@besserwisser.org> <20181102211625.GB20885@besserwisser.org> <20181102214114.GA92689@isc.org> <5eb5e946-88e7-59f2-1a7d-1eec3e606b9b@nic.cz> <CAAiTEH8_K=h+A0PqTh785a0tNxWhDg_Uu1UDOWb0QTJyyO2eag@mail.gmail.com> <ed4f4b57-ac02-a983-ae59-db5af9b78b96@nic.cz> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811071732040.4343@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <5BE329C8.8060101@redbarn.org>
In-Reply-To: <5BE329C8.8060101@redbarn.org>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 03:31:31 +0700
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+FTQuB69JeY9hrfc51iedN4W4ZkEA3qbQf=Drjrme=E-A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Cc: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000897aa9057a190143"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/37YRVj8ETfDraXJSpKXtxjUbtTQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Any website publishers who use CDNs on the list?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 20:31:44 -0000

Mr Paul is correct - getdns is the best path for developers.

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:07 AM Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> wrote:

>
>
> Tony Finch wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > And even if you can get the recursive server addresses, you should still
> > go through the name service switch to deal with names that aren't in the
> > DNS.
>
> agreed.
>
> >
> > The custom DNS stub resolvers that I know about (adns, ldns, libevent)
> > reimplement the libc resolver, with their own parsers for
> /etc/resolv.conf
> > and all the rest.
>
> dns requests should almost universally go out via the open source
> "getdns" API (https://getdnsapi.net/) at this point. if your code uses
> one of the above methods, or getXbyY() in any form, please investigate.
>
> --
> P Vixie
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>