Re: [DNSOP] Any website publishers who use CDNs on the list?

Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com> Wed, 07 November 2018 15:00 UTC

Return-Path: <matt@conundrum.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CBA130DD1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 07:00:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=conundrum-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mUvRIkKJLpa0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 07:00:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x132.google.com (mail-it1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED022130DCA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 07:00:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x132.google.com with SMTP id w7-v6so23104245itd.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 07:00:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=conundrum-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VlvKs0WXUC/3giUUFuOMun8bAfKwPdHIHzfe7IRORPg=; b=uyT+thM8eY19lxR+NpbmfHhx0FXcTxRu7Fy+wHDsl87Xppu/ZVHImPedtLA/kg7DG0 1HSS2CgE/xfNfyikD3NCZhriAj/+D/cnf5cdUzaVEPXG6wpsWcXFIEuEW8ENmUzbdECl F09p8wyi5tWrdmwGE/kqLoctAe2+x70Il5QKLNdUoXvV1T4+Tx8tiIQ35u4QNfdw6/y6 7NruFXq6E6zZfhT6P7zHbEGgQoRpgtHhRDOH/e2xVItTr0pAppFNxjIFAuBaZUe1huFF IECq5nCQSAz3MdRYDzyEwHCgYv/0LhrkcgkQA01aA7alNsp+CkeeFSwvIfXnwmnWDlgt 7mpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VlvKs0WXUC/3giUUFuOMun8bAfKwPdHIHzfe7IRORPg=; b=KTv2O/hCjYZ9pnFzZnpAfd4xlHAauKyzr+E0QMqb4k6Qg9b0ufik2JSmGzFArczQbQ WA4KAYqt0vOTzILxWCfd2zByFxuzEmBycoXBDUUHE2j3ks318/qSboqQxAiyf9SPaxi8 qx3GOzgpGBsKU/CW82xNSV20DMXVqZGH5re3qysQAGmTX6kwlQboEqXXGPOXiorLXOV4 WckeC22ZisqYiqPVCVHnAMdT6waqofVMZhgJaRF50xn5tCrlWYERUT+Az/utSnj4XyLO y9Ed1npqQGDKYkZ3684hF9kxrVjW0AiRCLTTni6ugDsShoTL+wxFa4Po+/TKRD5BEgZy JtVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gLCg8TdXXmrhtCdwzWk9Y6kyogCInn/wEqtMnkYEfBWQnHUUpmN ziwHqW0GwEgkJ4THN9nfvSQBNvHZ59+9+LP3jOLNkw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5eJomzKX2HM5qFoqKD74+GSZQMKCUQdLft4cSjvbbgFjIBI0D2oTGyJK4pruDQgjOUFtadgP1+yu7ww8lJup3Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:5553:: with SMTP id e80-v6mr496099itb.150.1541602854991; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 07:00:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CCEEBCEF-FE91-49A6-96FE-122A5E025159@isoc.org> <20181102121108.GE12840@besserwisser.org> <20181102211625.GB20885@besserwisser.org> <20181102214114.GA92689@isc.org> <5eb5e946-88e7-59f2-1a7d-1eec3e606b9b@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <5eb5e946-88e7-59f2-1a7d-1eec3e606b9b@nic.cz>
From: Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 10:00:43 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAiTEH8_K=h+A0PqTh785a0tNxWhDg_Uu1UDOWb0QTJyyO2eag@mail.gmail.com>
To: vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008ead5e057a1462af"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/F5Ke-7-ZP5IRuTmXbGYJH-axmrg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Any website publishers who use CDNs on the list?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 15:00:59 -0000

On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 06:11, Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>
wrote:

> On 11/2/18 10:41 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
> > Speaking as a co-author of ANAME, I agree about this. URI, SRV, a
> proposed
> > new HTTP RRtype, whatever - service lookup is absolutely the correct way
> to
> > accomplish this goal.
> >
> > However, browser vendors are *not doing that*, and I've given up hope
> that
> > they ever will. Trying to out-stubborn them has been ineffective.
>
> Yes, but I can understand that they're not too inclined - I believe it's
> not easy to portably get information about such RRTYPEs from the OS
> resolver, e.g. I can't see a way in POSIX.  Most http libraries would
> need to deal with this somehow.  It doesn't seem realistic to *wait* for
> OS implementations or even APIs to improve.  Overall it seems quite a
> stalemate, I'm afraid, probably without an "ideal" solution within
> reasonable timeframe.
>

Can you point to a major browser that does *not* implement its own resolver
already?

>
>