Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034.
bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com> Mon, 02 April 2018 07:42 UTC
Return-Path: <bert@hubertnet.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95A9126BF3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 00:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4K9O0ugCEVPL for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 00:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xs.powerdns.com (xs.powerdns.com [82.94.213.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E3841204DA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 00:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server.ds9a.nl (unknown [86.82.68.237]) by xs.powerdns.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41FFD9FB8C; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 07:42:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by server.ds9a.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 572D1AC3DA7; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 09:42:05 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 09:42:05 +0200
From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>
To: Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org>
Cc: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180402074205.GA10263@server.ds9a.nl>
References: <CAHw9_iJugi-bucEqLA=wsgf5J7C7BDN2zqHsNeHuckx2QAkpiw@mail.gmail.com> <20180401182807.GA14467@jurassic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180401182807.GA14467@jurassic>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/4vRs7C5tfQ7ZmDi8ttVkeWIgQcM>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 07:42:10 -0000
On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 11:58:07PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > Caching takes place not just by BIND, but Unbound as well and does not > cause problems, so the stronger requirement is unnecessary and ought to > be re-worded. PowerDNS recursor will also happily cache a *.record but not do anything special with it. I also see no strong requirement for this. In fact not caching a * record would open up fun ways of creating more spoofing opportunities I bet. BErt
- [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034. Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034. Mukund Sivaraman
- Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034. Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034. bert hubert
- Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034. Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034. Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [DNSOP] Verifying errata 5316 against RFC1034. Warren Kumari